
llm-gemini 0.35
Simon Willison releases llm-gemini 0.35 with support for Google's new Gemini 4 Argon model, available via the Gemini API and a $100/month subscription plan. He compares pricing: $2/M input and $10/M output at launch, doubling on December 1st to match Claude Opus 5.5. He argues per-token prices are poor comparators and points to Artificial Analysis's total benchmark run cost ($2,407 for Argon, near GLM-5.3 and cheaper than OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta models) as a better clue to agentic cost-efficiency. He also shows his SVG pelican outputs at low, medium and high settings.
What it claims
llm-gemini 0.35 adds support for Gemini 4 Argon, released on 13 October 2026 through the Gemini API and to customers of Google's $100/month subscription plan. The page places Argon's launch price of $2/M input and $10/M output against named models:
| Model | Price relative to Argon at launch |
|---|---|
| GPT-6 Sol | Same price |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 2× Argon |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 5× Argon |
| GPT-6 Astra | 5× Argon |
The price doubles on December 1st, which makes Argon the same price as Opus 5.5. If you are choosing a model on price, the launch window runs only until then.
Evidence
- Agentic cost proxy. Artificial Analysis publishes the total cost of running its benchmark with each model. For Argon that cost is $2,407. This is close to GLM-5.3 and "significantly cheaper" than the latest models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta. The page gives no per-model figures for those competitors.
- After the December price rise. The author says Argon will "still be a little cheaper than GPT-6 Astra." In context this seems to refer to the benchmark run cost, so after December 1st the cost advantage shrinks to a narrow margin over Astra only.
- SVG output. The author ran his pelican test at low, medium and high settings and rated all three outputs excellent. The high-setting image cost 17.166 cents. He notes that Gemini is the only lab he knows of whose staff have worked on SVG generation specifically.
Limits
- Benchmark cost figures. These come from a third party, Artificial Analysis, and the page reproduces them only in a chart. The author used ChatGPT to adjust the chart's layout. He says he checked that the data is correct.
- Per-token prices. The author argues these are poor comparators, because the cost that matters is how many tokens a model needs to finish a task inside an agentic harness. The page gives no token-count data of that kind.
- Missing practical details. The page does not state:
- the plugin install command
- the model ID string used in llm
- whether "low/medium/high" maps to a reasoning or thinking parameter
- any change in llm-gemini 0.35 other than Argon support
Check the plugin's release notes for these before you adopt it.
Organisations named here
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Meta
- Artificial Analysis
- Simon Willison
Technologies named here
- Gemini 4 Argon
- llm-gemini
- GPT-6 Sol
- Gemini API
- ChatGPT
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1
- GPT-6 Astra
- GLM-5.3
- Claude Haiku 5.5
- Gemini
- LLM
Related in models


