Tongyi-MAI/Qwen-Planner-Agent
Qwen-Planner-Agent is Alibaba's Tongyi MAI Team framework pairing a trained Planner Model with a stateful Harness to execute mobile tasks end-to-end, coordinating tools, persistent memory, reusable Skills, and sub-agents. It introduces Competence-Adaptive Reward-and-Advantage Engineering (CARE), a hybrid supervised+RL training approach, and reports the 27B model reaching 77.05% Overall on MobilePA-Bench at an estimated $2.41 per 1,000 tasks in output-token cost. This repo hosts the technical report/blog and recorded interactive examples rather than model weights or code.
What it claims
The repo hosts the blog and technical report site for Qwen-Planner-Agent — explicitly not the release repo for weights, training code, or the agent implementation (stated in both English and Chinese). Its distinguishing claim beyond the raw score: the 27B model's 77.05% Overall on MobilePA-Bench is 9.83 percentage points above its own baseline, and it ranks first in Overall among the evaluated systems in a comparison spanning tool use, memory, Skills, sub-agent coordination, and estimated output cost (the $2.41 / 1,000 tasks figure).
How it works
The framework is organized as a closed loop across three stages, where execution evidence from real runs feeds back into each:
flowchart LR D[AI for Data: task construction,<br/>trajectory collection, failure analysis] --> T[AI for Training: planning SL +<br/>hybrid-env RL with CARE] T --> H[AI for Harness: tool-conditioned Skills,<br/>evidence-grounded memory] H -->|execution evidence| D
CARE (the page calls it Competence-Aware Reward-and-Advantage Engineering, differing from the summary's "Competence-Adaptive") adapts rewards and advantages to the model's current competence, trading off task completion against reasoning and tool-use efficiency. The Harness is stateful: it retrieves task-relevant evidence, retains constraints across turns, reconciles prior dialogue with tool results, and revises only requested settings. On coordination, the planner respects action prerequisites, hands confirmed artifacts between sub-agents, and revises when tools return errors.
Evidence
Only the single benchmark line is quantified: 77.05% Overall, +9.83pp over baseline, ~$2.41/1,000 tasks (output tokens only, including thinking tokens; excludes input tokens, external tool charges, device execution, and Harness processing). No per-column numbers, dataset sizes, or compute are given in the fetched text.
Limits
There is nothing to run or adopt here — no weights, no code, no install commands. Actionable material is the technical report and recorded example replays (which preserve full tool arguments/returns including failed attempts and corrections), both hosted on the external project website. Cited as a 2026 tech report by "MAI Team, Alibaba Token Hub."
Organisations named here
- MAI Team
- Alibaba Token Hub
- Alibaba Group
- MobilePA-Bench
- Tongyi MAI Team
Technologies named here
- Harness
- Qwen-Planner-Agent
Techniques named here
- Closed-loop AI-for-AI development
- Competence-adaptive planner training
- CARE
- Contextual memory and state tracking
- Coordinated execution and recovery
- AI for Data
- AI for Harness
Related in agents



