Skip to content

Back to the catalog

FedRAMP Requirements for Vulnerability Management and Dependency Upgrades | Blog | Endor Labs
endorlabs.comarticle

FedRAMP Requirements for Vulnerability Management and Dependency Upgrades | Blog | Endor Labs

An Endor Labs blog post, written by a former JAB Technical Representative, details FedRAMP's Continuous Monitoring vulnerability management requirements: authenticated scanning, monthly dependency inventories, POA&M tracking, and strict remediation SLAs (High CVSS 7.0+ in 30 days, Medium in 90, Low in 180). It also covers FedRAMP's container-specific rules (hardened images, CISA KEV prohibition, pipeline/registry/runtime scanning) and outlines four practical strategies — reachability-based false-positive triage, EPSS-driven risk level adjustments, ROI/complexity-based upgrade prioritization, and developer-side PR gating — before pivoting into an Endor Labs product pitch.

TL;DR Explains FedRAMP's vulnerability scanning SLAs and container security rules, and how reachability/EPSS analysis can reduce remediation burden.
Open original ↗

Organisations named here

  • FedRAMP
  • NIST 800-53

Technologies named here

  • Endor Labs
  • CVSS
  • EPSS
  • Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
  • CISA KEV

Techniques named here

  • Authenticated scanning and full system authorization
  • Function-level reachability analysis
  • De-duplication of findings
  • Risk level adjustment using EPSS
  • ROI and complexity-based fix prioritization
  • Shift-left developer prevention via pipeline policies
  • Container image hardening
  • Artifact signing and verification

Related in GRC