
Combining EPSS and Reachability Analysis to Optimize Vulnerability Management | Blog | Endor Labs
Endor Labs breaks down how the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) v3 works — the exploitation telemetry, exploit-DB/GitHub/Metasploit code checks, CISA KEV/Project Zero/ZDI mentions, CVSS vectors, CWE, and social-media signals it ingests to score CVE exploitation likelihood — and shows that an EPSS-threshold (0.088) remediation strategy fixes the same share of exploited CVEs while patching only ~7.3% of known vulnerabilities versus ~82% under a "fix all high/critical" CVSS approach. It then explains a layered workflow: use reachability analysis (call-graph based) to cut findings by ~80% to what's actually exploitable in your environment, then apply EPSS on that reduced set to rank remaining issues by real-world exploitation likelihood, including for third-party/proprietary code where reachability analysis isn't feasible.
Organisations named here
- CWE-94
Technologies named here
- EPSS
- CVSS
- SSVC
- CISA KEV catalog
- Google Project Zero
- Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
- Exploit-DB
- GitHub
- Metasploit
- Intrigue
- Sn1per
- jaeles
- nuclei
- MITRE CVE List
- Fortiguard
- AlienVault
- GreyNoise
- Shadowserver Foundation
- Endor Labs reachability analysis
- NVD
- Endor Labs
- CISA KEV
Techniques named here
- Reachability analysis
- EPSS scoring
- Software composition analysis / dynamic analysis
Related in AppSec
Flowise MCP Security Bypass Enables RCE
Inside an Oracle Database SQL Injection Attack | Huntress
OASIS
