
Liquid Network Restores Full Bitcoin Backing Two Months After $320M Exploit
Liquid Network, the Blockstream-built Bitcoin sidechain, said on 3 November 2026 that its reserves are fully restored and all LBTC is backed 1:1 again. About 4,000 BTC (roughly $320M) was withdrawn from the federation wallet on 6 September 2026 by self-described white-hat hackers, who returned 3,400 BTC and kept about 598 BTC. Adam Back listed fixes: refreshed peg-out keys in cold hardware wallets, disabled proof validation caches with a node bug fix, and fail-closed consensus rules.
What it is
On 3 November 2026 the Liquid Federation said Liquid Network's Bitcoin reserves are fully restored and all LBTC is backed 1:1 again. This follows the 6 September 2026 withdrawal of about 4,000 BTC (roughly $320M) from the federation wallet. Blockstream CEO Adam Back posted a dashboard screenshot showing assets matching liabilities at 100% and a reserve deficit of 0.00 BTC.
How it works
The attackers described themselves as white hats. They communicated with Blockstream through PGP-signed messages embedded in Bitcoin transactions. On 7 September they returned 3,400 BTC (about $269M) after Blockstream said the bridge nodes had been patched, and they kept roughly 598 BTC. BTC to LBTC swaps at 1:1 through participating providers resumed several weeks before the announcement.
What to do
Users running their own Liquid nodes can check the federation's reserves directly, so the 1:1 claim does not have to rest on the dashboard screenshot. The page gives no command or procedure for this check.
Back named three defences against a repeat:
- Peg-out authorization keys were refreshed and are now held in cold hardware wallets.
- Proof validation caches are disabled, together with a bug fix for nodes.
- Consensus rules are hardened to "fail closed".
Back also said the network has been through multiple third-party audits. The page does not name the auditors or give node versions.
Caveats
- The federation did not say how the shortfall left by the hack was covered. Whether the 598 BTC was recovered, replaced or absorbed is not stated.
- Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet said that if the kept coins were a negotiated reward, it looked "more like extortion than white-hat hacking." Blockstream refused to pay a ransom and called the act theft.
- Back's remark on AI is a lesson, not a finding: "treat with suspicion (don't trust, verify) AI suggested fixes." The page does not say AI-suggested fixes played a part in this incident. On 20 October, Back told Bloomberg Television that "a wave of AI-assisted security analysis" had been affecting many companies in the sector.
- The federation said it is modernizing governance, with clearer responsibilities and oversight, and will give details in the coming weeks.
- The page does not describe the vulnerability itself.
Organisations named here
- Blockstream
- Adam Back
- Charles Guillemet
- Ledger
- Liquid Federation
Technologies named here
- Liquid Network
- Bitcoin
- Cold hardware wallets
- LBTC
- Liquid bridge nodes (Blockstream)
- Liquid federation wallet (Blockstream)
- Liquid Network dashboard
- Liquid node
- PGP
Techniques named here
- Disabling proof validation caches
- Fail-closed consensus rules
- Key rotation
- Third-party security audit
- Unauthorized withdrawal from federation wallet
Concepts named here
- 1:1 backing
- AI-assisted security analysis
- Federation custody
- Sidechain
- Verify, don't trust (AI-suggested fixes)
- White-hat versus theft
Related in Blockchain

THORChain Exploit Report #2 — GG20 root-cause disclosure

Black Thursday revisited: MakerDAO keeper exploited for $500K
.jpg)