Skip to content

Back to the catalog

The first part of the EU Cyber Resiliency Act comes into effect on September 11th. Are you Ready? | Blog | Endor Labs
endorlabs.comarticle

The first part of the EU Cyber Resiliency Act comes into effect on September 11th. Are you Ready? | Blog | Endor Labs

Endor Labs breaks down the EU Cyber Resilience Act's Article 14 vulnerability/incident reporting obligation that took effect September 11, 2026, covering the three-stage 24/72-hour/final report cadence, the Commission's July 2026 guidance on when a manufacturer becomes "aware," and Article 64's tiered fines (up to €15M/2.5% turnover). It argues that reachability analysis — determining whether a vulnerable function/package is actually callable in a product — is becoming the deciding factor in whether a vulnerability triggers a reportable event, citing Endor Labs' SCA and Container Reachability tooling that reduces findings by up to 92% and 90% respectively.

TL;DR Breakdown of the EU CRA's September 11 reporting deadline (Article 14 awareness clock, penalties, reachability's growing role in triage) from Endor Labs.
Document

What it is

Endor Labs' operational guide to the September 11, 2026 activation of Article 14 reporting under the EU Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847), read against the Commission's July 27 guidance C(2026) 5252 final. The summary states the deadlines and fine tiers; this page carries the scope boundaries, the "aware" defense, and exemptions the summary omits.

Preconditions / Affected

"Product with digital elements" means software supplied to a user and executed on the user's side. Browser extensions and locally installed apps — including Electron apps — are in scope. A web app or PWA running only in the browser is not in scope on that basis (NIS2 covers it), but ship a local client and its server-side dependency counts as a remote data-processing solution. The obligation applies to products already on the market before December 2027 and continues past end-of-support.

What to do

The reporting event turns on when you became "aware." Per paragraphs 213–214, you are aware only once an initial assessment gives reasonable certainty of active exploitation or a severe incident — you may verify a suspicion first, but the assessment must begin without delay regardless of source (customer, researcher, authority, press). Defend this with timestamps: when the report arrived, when assessment began, when you verified. Without that record, hindsight assumes the clock started at intake.

What does not start a clock: scanner findings, a published CVE with no exploitation in your product, coordinated disclosure, your own pentest results. There is no duty to hunt for exploitation.

One exception overrides the exploitation condition: a report of planted malicious code or a compromised build pipeline is a severe incident under Article 14(5)(b), reportable with no established exploitation.

Reachability is the deciding data point (paragraph 218): if a third-party component vulnerability is exploited in your product, report; if it cannot be or has not been exploited there, Article 14 falls away even when the same CVE is actively exploited elsewhere — leaving only voluntary Article 15 notification and telling the maintainer under Article 13(6).

flowchart TD
    A[Tip received] --> B[Begin assessment without delay]
    B --> C{Reasonable certainty of<br/>exploitation IN your product?}
    C -->|Yes| R[24h report via ENISA platform]
    C -->|No| D{Planted malicious code /<br/>compromised build?}
    D -->|Yes| R
    D -->|No| E[No Article 14 clock<br/>Art 15 voluntary only]

Caveats

Microenterprises and small enterprises are exempt from fines for missed reporting deadlines; open-source stewards face no administrative fines at all. The page notes fines aren't the worst exposure — market surveillance authorities can order withdrawal, prohibit availability, or recall. The 24h/72h windows are calendar hours: they run through weekends and holidays. Reports are confidential (CSIRT + ENISA), not public; Article 14(8) separately requires informing users, direct customers directly.

Organisations named here

  • ENISA
  • EU Cyber Resilience Act
  • NIS2

Technologies named here

  • Browser extensions
  • Endor Labs SCA
  • Endor Labs Container Reachability
  • Locally installed applications, including Electron apps
  • Endor Labs AI SAST
  • ENISA Single Reporting Platform
  • Endor Labs
  • Cursor

Techniques named here

  • Reachability analysis
  • SBOM