Skip to content

Back to the catalog

TRM and Chainalysis Tie $6.4B Binance Hack to North Korea's TraderTraitor
decrypt.coarticle

TRM and Chainalysis Tie $6.4B Binance Hack to North Korea's TraderTraitor

TRM Labs and Chainalysis attribute the October 2026 Binance theft, about $6.4 billion across 10 blockchains, to North Korea's TraderTraitor. On Ethereum the attacker used EIP-7702 delegation with 50 pre-signed authorizations to turn a hot wallet into a sweeper, pointing to compromised signing infrastructure. The attacker funded wallets via Tornado Cash, laundered through automation and Aave borrowing, and about $3 billion was frozen.

TL;DR Analytics firms blame North Korea's TraderTraitor for the $6.4B Binance theft, citing EIP-7702 sweeper use, Tornado Cash funding and fund commingling with the Bitget exploit.
Document

What it is

TRM Labs (with "high confidence") and Chainalysis attribute the Binance theft to TraderTraitor, the North Korean group the FBI blamed for the February 2025 Bybit hack ($1.5 billion). TRM puts the loss at about $6.36 billion across 10 chains, Chainalysis at about $6.4 billion. Most of it moved in roughly 20 minutes starting 4:05 p.m. ET on Thursday. Pangolin Intelligence also told CNN it believes a North Korean unit is responsible. North Korea has previously denied hacking allegations.

How it works

On Ethereum, per TRM, the attacker used an EIP-7702 delegation (from the Pectra upgrade, which lets an ordinary wallet run contract code) to turn a Binance hot wallet into a sweeper. Fifty authorizations were pre-signed in advance. On the other nine chains, Binance wallets sent funds through ordinary signed transfers. TRM reads that as compromise of Binance's hot wallet signing infrastructure.

Binance says the investigation began with a compromised engineer's laptop and has found "additional points of breach." Decrypt notes that Bybit also began with one compromised machine, a Safe developer's computer.

flowchart LR
    A[Compromised engineer laptop] --> B[Hot wallet signing infrastructure]
    B --> C[Ethereum: EIP-7702 sweeper, 50 pre-signed authorizations]
    B --> D[9 other chains: ordinary signed transfers]
    C --> E[Laundering and freeze race]
    D --> E

Attribution evidence

  • Chainalysis saw stolen funds commingle in real time with proceeds of last month's Bitget exploit, which had been attributed to North Korean actors. It calls this the strongest evidence.
  • The attacker's operational wallet was funded through Tornado Cash (TRM and Chainalysis).
  • TRM cites staging that began well before the theft, matching Bybit and April's KelpDAO exploit.

Laundering and recovery

Chainalysis reports "never-seen-before laundering patterns": thousands of transactions in a short time, suggesting automation that cycles funds among addresses. TRM says the attacker sold USDT to market makers and borrowed ETH against USDT on Aave to get ahead of issuer freezes.

The attacker now holds more than 420,000 ETH and 18,270 BTC, about $2.4 billion that no issuer can freeze. Tether, Circle, Ripple and World Liberty Financial froze about $2.67 billion in stablecoins. Arbitrum's Security Council froze 8,426 ETH and 74.6 million ARB. Binance puts total frozen funds at about $3 billion.

Binance has reserved more than $6.34 billion of its own funds to cover losses, $5 billion of it already held in the stolen tokens. It is buying the rest on the market and over the counter. These figures exclude frozen assets.

Caveats

The article gives no indicators of compromise, wallet addresses or detection guidance. The signing-infrastructure compromise is TRM's assessment, and Binance's investigation is still open. Attribution rests on the firms' on-chain and off-chain analysis, which the article does not detail beyond the points above.

Organisations named here

  • Binance
  • Bitget
  • Bybit
  • Chainalysis
  • Circle
  • FBI
  • KelpDAO
  • Pangolin Intelligence
  • TRM Labs

Technologies named here

  • Tornado Cash
  • Binance
  • Ethereum
  • Aave
  • TRM Labs
  • Safe
  • Chainalysis
  • Bybit
  • Bitget
  • KelpDAO
  • Tether
  • Pangolin Intelligence

Standards and laws named here

  • EIP-7702

Techniques named here

  • Automated laundering
  • Compromise of developer or engineer endpoint
  • Cryptocurrency mixing
  • EIP-7702 delegation
  • Infiltration through fake hiring
  • On-chain fund commingling analysis
  • Planting malicious code in provider infrastructure

Concepts named here

  • Attribution confidence
  • Funds beyond issuer reach
  • Hot wallet signing infrastructure compromise
  • Stablecoin issuer freezes

Threat actors named here

  • TraderTraitor
  • North Korea
  • DPRK
  • Bitget exploit (September 2026 per page 'last month'; attributed to North Korean actors; funds commingled with Binance loot)
  • Bybit hack (February 2025, $1.5 billion; began with a compromised Safe developer's computer and malicious code planted in Safe's infrastructure)
  • KelpDAO exploit (April 2026; North Korea-linked per TRM)
  • North Korean IT worker schemes (10 individuals and one entity sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury on Wednesday)