Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai) on XRohan Paul's X post summarizes a TikTok paper on MCP attacks. LLM agents often finish the requested task, then quietly call an attacker-controlled logging tool that records the user query, the server reply and the final answer. The attack works because agents read natural-language tool descriptions when choosing and ordering tool calls. The visible text is truncated and gives no success rates or defenses.
x.comthreadAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Don't Lose the Thread: Empowering Long-Horizon LLM Agents with Cognitive Resource Self-AllocationCORAL (Cognitive Resource Self-Allocation) is an agent-callable working-memory toolset that lets an LLM agent checkpoint task progress and verified facts, then reset its cluttered context and resume from a clean state. A Multi-episode Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization algorithm trains the checkpointing. With an 8B model it reaches 42.8% average accuracy on GAIA, uses 6-7x fewer input tokens than a ReAct agent, and adds 8.0 points to a proprietary agent on BrowseComp.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π§ AI
SEAL: Sealed Queries for Local Sanitization against Indirect Prompt InjectionSEAL is a defense against indirect prompt injection for local LLM agents. It learns a soft prompt and scoring readout offline, then uses a frozen task model to score and delete injected tokens from tool outputs, with queries built from trusted initial context. On AgentDojo, attack success falls from 34.6% to 0.1% and Joint rises from 51.4% to 77.5%, using about 127x fewer defense tokens than PISanitizer.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
REALM: Identifying Minimal Task Assets for LLM AgentsREALM (Required Execution Assets Linked to a Mission) is an approach to applying least privilege to LLM agents by identifying the assets a task needs, including ones discovered at runtime. It models assets as Dependency Graph nodes, separates discovering an asset from authorizing it, and exposes resource-bound Partial APIs inside a Task Container. On AgentDyn with qwen3.5-flash, attack success rate falls from 16.6% to 0.2%, with 40.0% task completion on clean tasks and 36.4% on injected cases.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security- Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai) on X
Rohan Paul's X post summarizes the paper "Log-To-Leak: Prompt Injection Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents via the Model Context Protocol", from TikTok researchers. It reports that MCP-using agents often finish the requested task, then quietly call an attacker-controlled logging tool that records the query, server reply and final answer. The attack works through natural-language tool descriptions that agents read when choosing and ordering tools. The visible text is truncated.
x.comthreadAdded 29 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security - Cryptography and Security Papers (@FSFG) on X
Log-To-Leak is an arXiv paper (cs.CR, cs.AI) by Yuepeng Hu, Chongyu Fan, Sirat Samyoun and Jian Du on prompt injection attacks against tool-using LLM agents through the Model Context Protocol. The title points to a logging-based data leakage channel. The fetched page holds only the title, authors and arXiv link, with no abstract, so the method and results are not visible here.
x.compaperAdded 29 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Think Before You Act: Decision Gate for LLM AgentsJevAct is a runtime verification framework that intercepts selected LLM agent actions before execution and returns feedback for bounded revision. It compiles domain policies into executable state checks and structured questions scored by a prefill-only decision model, giving probability-based judgments without generation. Tested on eleven agents with tau^2-bench Airline and Telecom and BFCL, it gained consistently on Telecom and BFCL and was mixed on Airline.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π§ AI
Repairs for Whom? Evaluator-Executor Mismatch in Selecting Repairs for Failed LLM AgentsRepairs for Whom? studies single-step repairs of failed LLM agent trajectories and asks whether common evaluators (greedy replay, stronger models, oracles, log-reading judges) pick repairs that help the deployed agent. Using independent rollouts in ALFWorld and WebShop, greedy replay loses 0.06-0.13 in expected gain, and Qwen2.5-14B rollouts misselect repairs for Qwen2.5-7B. The authors recommend verifying repairs with the executor that will run them.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π§ AI
Session-Bound Behavioral Watermarking for Autonomous LLM AgentsAgentAnchor is a session-keyed behavioral watermark for attributing LLM agent trajectory logs to an owner. It derives per-step keys from a secret key, a fresh public session ID and semantic observation states, and embeds parity evidence through a KL-bounded exponential tilt. The paper formalizes learned cross-session forgery, and a trusted verifier checks disputed logs using wrong-key calibration and abstention.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Session-Bound Behavioral Watermarking for Autonomous LLM AgentsAgentAnchor is a session-keyed behavioral watermark that lets an agent owner prove ownership of a trajectory log. Each step key comes from a secret key, a fresh public session identifier and semantic states of recent observations. Parity evidence is embedded through a KL-bounded exponential tilt of action choices. A trusted verifier checks disputed logs without rerunning the agent, using wrong-key calibration and abstention. The paper also formulates a learned cross-session forgery threat.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π§ AI
What Effort Level Should I Choose? On the Economics of Reasoning Effort in LLM AgentsThis paper treats LLM reasoning effort as a credence good and measures the counterfactual effect of effort levels on proprietary and open-weight models across four benchmarks, including long-horizon agentic tasks. Higher effort often fails on tasks lower effort solved, and on easy tasks the top level costs up to 42x the lowest. Starting at the lowest effort and escalating only after a verified failure matches or beats fixed top effort, usually at lower cost for proprietary models.
huggingface.copaperAdded 28 Oct 2026π§ AI
Can LLMs Uncover Hidden Physical Laws through Free Exploration?LongChang is an automated framework that builds simulated worlds with altered physical laws, such as heavier objects falling more slowly, to test whether LLMs can find the law by free exploration. Explorer LLMs manipulate objects and build tools without tasks or hints, while separate LLM agents generate scenes, review tool designs and grade reports. Across 12 LLMs, GPT-6 Astra reached a 16.7% discovery rate and the other 11 scored 0%.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026π§ AI
Log-To-Leak: Prompt Injection Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents via the Model Context ProtocolLog-To-Leak is a prompt-injection attack on tool-using LLM agents that abuses Model Context Protocol tool metadata to trigger an attacker-controlled logging call after the last legitimate call, leaking the user query, server name, server response and agent response. Evaluated on five MCP servers and four agents, it reaches 62.64-100% attack success with 76.55-95.64% logging accuracy. Three defenses leave over 55% residual ASR on GitHub MCP with GPT-4o.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety DeploymentsSentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety deployments. It scores attack success, over-refusal (missing a real emergency) and over-reaction (unwarranted action) on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts, disaster messages and injection payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution pushed over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026π§ AI
SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety DeploymentsSentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety settings (public alerts, responder dispatch, citizen-record queries). It scores attack success, over-refusal and over-reaction on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts and real injection/jailbreak payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution raised over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm on every model.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM AgentsContinual Learning Exam (CLE) is a benchmark of 120 human-authored tasks, each a five-level ladder (600 levels) across 89 professional roles and 12 occupational domains, built by 50+ domain experts. Agents must pass a level to unlock the next, and an evaluation agent scores submissions against human rubrics. Across 17 harness-model configurations, feedback plus one revision adds a median 5.3 points; the best system clears 47.7% of levels and finishes all five levels in 23.3% of tasks.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026π§ AI- KhulekanisiyandaMchunu/llm-trading-arena
wtfibought (llm-trading-arena) is an MIT-licensed live arena where LLM agents trade virtual capital on real market data with all reasoning public. Users bring their own model and key, set the wake candle interval, leverage range and margin budget, with at most three symbols and twelve model calls per wake. The stack is Spring Boot on Java 25 with Spring AI, PostgreSQL, Redis and a React 19 frontend.
github.comrepoAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
What Transfers Across Protein Pockets? Experience Reuse in Molecular Optimization for Agentic Structure-Based Drug DesignThis paper studies experience reuse for LLM agents that optimize ligands in protein pockets by editing and docking. Using the full log of one agent run over CrossDocked2020 test-set pockets, it tests whether keys in an experience base recur on unseen pockets and separate improving from worsening edits. The separation is largely explained by molecule size change, action and round, not the target. The authors conclude a base may better prioritize an agent's own proposals for docking than prescribe what to build.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
Tool-Calling LLM Agents Under Realistic MCP Faults: Scale Does Not Purchase Fault ToleranceMCP-Injector is a protocol-aware fault-injection middleware for Model Context Protocol tool calls, with permanent, transient and intermittent faults on seedable schedules. Its fault model comes from 57,240 issue and PR threads across 1,774 open-source MCP repositories. In a 1,350-cell experiment, faults cut task-completion score by 60% (8.08 to 3.23 of 10), and the 120B gpt-oss model was no more resilient than the 20B. Agent stacks differed in how well they absorbed faults.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
Cache Engineering for Agents (AKV)AKV introduces cache engineering, which lets LLM agents control their active KV cache with drop (exclude cache from future attention) and repos (adjust retained keys' position encodings) without editing the trajectory or re-prefilling. The AKV serving engine keeps a stateless API while managing stateful cache reuse, eviction and restoration. A tool-response rolling-drop policy raised benchmark scores by 1.7 points and cut cost 27.7% versus threshold-triggered summarization.
huggingface.copaperAdded 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
EpiSEM-Bench: Evaluating Safety and Evidence Recovery in LLM Agents under Missing EvidenceEpiSEM-Bench is an executable benchmark of 300 matched unsafe/safe task pairs across six domains. It tests whether tool-using LLM agents take prohibited actions when a tool response omits a safety-relevant fact, even though the request is benign and all returned statements are true. It finds large variation across ten models, and recovery access cuts unsafe execution for all ten.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026π§ AI
SARIA: Persistence-Aware KV Caching with Coordinated DRAM--SSD Reload for LLM AgentsSARIA (Selective Admission and Reload for Inference Acceleration) is a KV caching system that jointly manages DRAM and SSD for multi-turn LLM agents. It persists only blocks likely to be reused beyond DRAM residency, promotes SSD-hit blocks into DRAM for same-session reuse, and paces DRAM reads with a transfer coordinator. Built on LMCache MP, it cuts SSD writes by 57.1 to 58.9% versus full duplicate caching and mean TTFT by 42.3 to 79.7% versus DRAM-only caching.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 23 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026π§ AI
IFC-MCQ: Automatically Generating Multiple-Choice Benchmarks for Evaluating LLM Agents on IFC Data RetrievalIFC-MCQ is a method that automatically generates multiple-choice benchmarks from Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) building-model files, so answers can be graded by exact option-set match instead of human or LLM review. Its taxonomy has 15 categories and 36 subtypes in four groups, with answer keys from the file and distractors from file values or rules. Two agentic setups, tool-based and code-based retrieval, showed category-specific failures and variation by IFC model and interface.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 23 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026π§ AI- There isn't an easy exploit for this PHP vulnerability
An opinion post from 21 October 2026 arguing that a widely feared PHP vulnerability has no easy exploit. The author says the many GitHub "PoC" repositories fail against a vanilla PHP instance in Docker. They claim LLM agents produced them by depending on a local-file-inclusion flaw or by modifying the server to be vulnerable. The author also argues that LLM defaults make many people's judgements identical.
eliastaylor.comarticleAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026π§ AI
Cache Engineering for AgentsCache Engineering for Agents proposes letting LLM agents control their active KV cache directly, using a drop operation to exclude cache from attention and repos to adjust retained keys' position encodings, without editing the trajectory or re-prefilling. The authors build the AKV serving engine to handle history-dependent cache states. A tool-response rolling-drop policy raises average benchmark scores by 1.7 points and cuts cost by 27.7% against threshold-triggered summarization. AKV gives up to 1.2x output throughput and 1.5x faster P95 latency.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π§ AI- vxcontrol/pentagi
PentAGI is an open-source, self-hosted multi-agent system that uses LLM agents to carry out penetration testing tasks autonomously. The MIT-licensed repo has a Go backend, a React frontend and GraphQL. It ships Docker Compose files for Langfuse tracing, Graphiti knowledge-graph memory and an observability stack. Topics list OpenAI and Anthropic as model backends.
github.comrepoAdded 20 Oct 2026π§ AI
After the Attacker Leaves: Benchmarking Carryover Attacks on LLM AgentsCarryoverBench is a benchmark of 12 personal-assistant scenarios and 101 attack tasks for carryover attacks, where a one-time indirect prompt injection planted in agent memory files or scheduled tasks re-fires in later sessions. Three trigger channels (Instant, Autonomous, Latent) are scored by a rule-based verifier with separate planting and triggering stages. Across five frontier models, payloads re-fire over five rounds without measurable decay. Porting the Latent channel to the Hermes runtime weakens the effect but does not remove it.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Can It Actually Work? Synthesizing Functional CAD MechanismsFunCAD-Harness is a framework in which LLM agents design CAD mechanisms and revise them using physical simulation feedback. It turns abstract functional requirements into candidate-specific physical tests. The paper also introduces FunCADBench, a benchmark of 46 mechanism families with interdependent, multi-step operations. Experiments on frontier LLM agents show it exposes mechanical failures that visual inspection misses and raises functional success over standard simulation-augmented baselines.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π§ AI
Same Simulation, Different Evidence: Where Retrieved Tool Output Costs LLM Agents AccuracyThis paper studies how keeping long tool output out of the context window, and reading it through a section index instead, costs LLM agents accuracy. Using the PHREEQC geochemistry simulator on 158 execution-verified multiple-choice items and 11,007 logged calls, GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 lose 11.3 and 7.9 points, while Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 show no detectable cost. The authors name the failure evidence substitution: agents skip the report and misround from their own output files.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π§ AI
Hybrid Reasoning Agents: LLM agents that think in latent space, act through textHybrid Reasoning Agents (HybridAgents) are LLM agents that switch between latent reasoning and text-based interaction in one generation process. A lightweight HybridLink handles mode transitions, continuous working memory keeps hybrid context across turns, and HybridSFT plus HybridRL train when to think latently and when to act in text. Across 3 model scales and 11 benchmarks, the paper reports 10.4% higher performance, 35.5%-54.7% fewer tokens, and 1.8x-2.6x faster inference.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 19 Oct 2026, published 18 Oct 2026π§ AI
Showing 30 of 118
Show more