262 results for “LMS”

WM-Basin is a Meta method for detecting student LLMs distilled from watermarked teacher models, described in "Watermark Basins: Black-Box Detection of Distilled LLMs" (arXiv:2610.37266, 27 October 2026). It feeds a suspect model's API text into a clean probe model and checks gradient alignment with a key-specific watermark basin. It reached 79% true-positive rate at 0.1% false-positive rate across 1,200 students, versus 29% for the prior token-level detector. Clean-data fine-tuning and paraphrasing weaken it.

en.cryptonomist.charticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026🧠 AI

llm-trails is an open study of what LLMs choose to do next inside a breached AWS account. It puts 14 models in 13 post-compromise situations, records only a single-turn plan with nothing executed, and codes each answer to CloudTrail events. The repo has the llmtrials harness, prompts, codebook, processed dataset (viz_data.json) and an interactive dashboard, so the study can be rerun or extended.

github.comrepoAdded 30 Oct 2026🧠 AI

llm-trails is a research repo that placed 14 LLMs in 13 post-compromise AWS situations, asked only for their next move (single-turn, nothing executed), and coded each answer to CloudTrail events. It includes the llmtrials harness, prompts, codebook, processed dataset (viz_data.json) and an interactive dashboard. Rates are conditioned on the situation shown, and the aim is turning model behavior into detection priorities.

github.comrepoAdded 30 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

dfbench is a held-out benchmark maintained by depthfirst that scores frontier LLMs on defensive security work: vulnerability detection, validation (precision) and differential analysis between commits. It reports recall, precision, F1 and cost per task by model and thinking level, split by application, low-level and smart-contract code and by single or multi-repo scope. Overall detection recall runs from about 21% to 69%, with the top figure at $99.19 per task for Mythos 5; validation precision mostly falls between 15% and 49%.

depthfirst.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

TextSeal2 is a distortion-free LLM text watermark that merges two or more keys into one virtual key and couples it to fresh noise through AutoMark's Gaussian copula. Under speculative decoding it verifies keyed drafts with an extra exponential race, so output matches the target model and acceptance rate is unchanged. On three LLMs at a 10^-3 false-positive rate, it detects 8 to 22 points more 100-token answers than TextSeal.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

TextSeal2 is a distortion-free watermark for LLM output that keeps its signal under speculative decoding. It merges two or more keys into one virtual key coupled to fresh noise through AutoMark's Gaussian copula, and verifies drafts with an extra exponential race. On three LLMs it detects 8 to 22 points more 100-token answers than TextSeal at a 10^-3 false-positive rate.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

PhysCount is a benchmark of 546 real-world images and 4,595 human-written questions in 651 target-specific groups. It tests whether multimodal LLMs can separate visible appearances (direct view, reflections, glass) from the physical entities behind them. Across 40 MLLMs, counting appearances is much easier than linking them to entities, and the best model answers every question correctly in only 13.36% of groups.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

Understanding and Mitigating Role Spoofing in LLMs is an arXiv paper (October 2026) on role spoofing, a prompt injection where malicious tool output impersonates the user. It shows models track "who said what" using both content cues (semantics, style) and structure cues (control tokens, formatting). Attacks combining fake structure and content succeed often, adversarial training stops only content-based attacks, and linear probes trained to predict conversation roles detect spoofing across settings.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

A five-task benchmark tests multimodal LLM color judgment against CIE colorimetric ground truth: AWB pair judgment, skin-tone bias direction, CCT estimation, Delta E 2000 pair ordering, and color naming under changing illuminants. Eight endpoints were tested. On ColorChecker-24 stimuli, closed frontier models reach CCT MAE of 715-1056 K versus 1358-2133 K for open-weight models, and a non-ColorChecker control shows this gap is partly template-dependent.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

tl;dr sec #352 is a security newsletter issue covering [un]prompted talks (AI-assisted firmware patching, a "Security Constitution" for finding cloud design flaws), Azure API Connections cross-tenant bugs worth $200,000, and a test of 14 LLMs given AWS keys. It also covers a paper on malicious LLM API routers (9 of 428 injecting code) and Datadog's "counterfeit policy" bypass of the Jev classifier.

tldrsec.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

TrussTutor-Bench is a benchmark of 200 verified two-dimensional truss problems from statics, paired with automatically generated student solutions. It evaluates thirteen LLMs on solution accuracy (64.5% to 97.0%), error detection (90.4% to 100%) and sycophancy. Models rejected their own correct solutions in 1.6% to 50.0% of cases when a student insisted the work was wrong. Sycophancy separated models; error detection did not.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

This paper studies whether vision-language models can infer how long a person stays somewhere (living, staying, or leaving) from geotagged social media posts. The authors build a new corpus of geotagged tweets co-annotated by humans and LLMs. State-of-the-art models struggle even with multi-turn Chain-of-Thought prompting, often missing contextual cues and subtle hashtags while over-relying on prominent visual details.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

inkGround is a benchmark for stroke trajectory recovery from full-page, camera-captured handwriting, with 537 page images (about 18.7k words, 163k strokes) and pseudo-label references filtered by OCR agreement and human raters. Models get a page image and a target word, then output ordered stroke points. Seven VLMs were scored with DTW, Chamfer distance, readability and style similarity. Closed-source models, notably Gemini-3.1-Pro, did best, and the ranking held on IAM-OnDB.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

LongChang is an automated framework that builds simulated worlds with altered physical laws, such as heavier objects falling more slowly, to test whether LLMs can find the law by free exploration. Explorer LLMs manipulate objects and build tools without tasks or hints, while separate LLM agents generate scenes, review tool designs and grade reports. Across 12 LLMs, GPT-6 Astra reached a 16.7% discovery rate and the other 11 scored 0%.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

VideoLVR is a method that lets video multimodal LLMs build latent visual evidence from local regions at relevant moments and reason over it interleaved with text tokens. A visual token prediction objective, defined over a vocabulary derived from the input video, supervises the latents. It extends to reinforcement learning with sampled visual tokens as actions and final-answer rewards, and improves fine-grained video benchmarks without much context growth.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

This paper defines a character naming task for films: given a name spoken in dialogue and its video context, the model must pick which visible character bears that name. It provides a dataset with annotations for character naming and first appearances, a video-and-dialogue model, and a comparison with proprietary multimodal LLMs. It also proposes a progressive framework that builds a character bank as the film plays, without cast lists or actor photographs.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

This paper studies how multimodal LLMs refuse questions that an image cannot answer, using the MoHoBench benchmark on three MLLMs. It varies the meaning and placement of refusal instructions, compares supervised and preference-based post-training, and intervenes on a refusal-related activation direction. Instructions change refusal at the sample level in ways aggregate rates hide. Post-training raises refusal most but can mix refusal with attempted answers. Activation intervention gives smaller, transferable changes.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

A dermatologist tested GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 on 200 biopsy-proven lesions from MILK10k, giving each a clinical and a dermoscopic image. A CNN (Inception v3, fine-tuned for about twenty minutes on 68,011 ISIC images) named the right diagnosis for 62% of lesions, against 42% for both LLMs. The post lists caveats (small sample, single run, possible contamination) and links the cases, prompts, replies and scoring code.

lynchlab.netwriteupAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

Falko Strenzke's ePrint 2026/2635 presents a multi-target second-preimage attack on message hashing in HSS/LMS and XMSS with SHA-256 and SHA-256/192. It herds chaining states from many collected signatures into one state, defeating the key and leaf-index prefix. With 2^64 signatures, SHA-256 cost falls from 2^256 to about 2^166 (2^156 at maximal message length). SHAKE256 parameter sets are unaffected.

eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

Open bilingual (Russian and UK English) benchmark of five open pseudonymisation tools and a regex baseline, plus a new engine built on the two strongest tools. On a held-out set of 1,000 synthetic documents per language, the best existing tools leave a whole personal value visible in 61% (Russian) and 58% (UK) of documents. The engine does so in 0.3% and 0.2%. Russian name restoration reaches only 94.6%, below the 99% threshold. Real documents were not tested.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

This paper presents an open benchmark of five existing pseudonymisation tools and a regex baseline on Russian and UK English documents, plus an open engine built on the two strongest tools. On a held-out set of 1,000 synthetic documents per language, the best existing tools leave a whole value visible in 58 to 61% of documents. The engine does so in 0.2 to 0.3%. Russian name restoration reaches only 94.6%, below the 99% threshold. Real documents were not tested.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

This paper presents a pipeline that uses persona-conditioned vision language models to surface interpretive ambiguity in visualizations. Topic-relevant personas elicit candidate takeaways, and a Target-Pattern-Scope framework lets LLM judges label statement pairs as Compatible, Disjoint or Opposing, which are summarized in an ambiguity profile. The authors benchmark VLMs on chart comprehension per chart type, check labeling against human annotations, and run case studies on public visualizations and a redesign.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

InteractiveWorld is an environment for closed-loop interaction between an AI assistant and a simulated human agent who sees the scene, follows instructions and acts independently. InteractiveBench, built on it, has 120 multi-turn tasks in six categories scored by verifiable, state-based rewards. Across 12 frontier MLLMs, the best model, Claude Fable 5.1, reaches at most 20% on long-horizon Guidance and 25% on Planning tasks.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

DRILS is an LLM-based agentic framework for requirements change impact analysis. It uses multiple agents to generate candidate impact sets, with an LLM-as-a-judge promoting diversity in selection. It adds RE-RAG, a tuned retrieval technique, and a requirement dependency graph as a knowledge source. On three curated datasets it reaches 87.1% recall, 76.3% precision and 81% F1 at lower cost than baselines. The authors release the datasets.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

AutoTavern is a self-improving system of specialised LLM research agents with a typed shared memory and verification gates. In 20 days it built TavernGym, a full-content Hearthstone Battlegrounds simulator, and 23 versions of TavernAgent, a PPO-trained player. TavernAgent averaged placement 1.60 with 80% first places over its last 20 live games, beating the top ten players (2.34, 59%). On TavernBench (960 tasks), it answered 91% of play tasks against at most 63% for frontier LLMs.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

TriageRAG is a failure-aware self-training method for adapting retrieval-augmented LLMs to specialized domains using only an unlabeled corpus. It probes the student on self-generated questions with and without retrieved context, sorts them into known, solved, context-failure and retrieval-failure, and routes each to a matching training signal. With Qwen3-4B on 11 datasets it beats budget-matched SimRAG by 1.2-6.4 points and recovers closed-book accuracy where retrieval hurts.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

RALE (Representation-Aware Logical Ensemble) is a method for detecting vulnerabilities in C source code with LLMs trained on different code representations: raw source, Abstract Syntax Trees and Control Flow Graphs. The authors show the representations suit different vulnerability classes, and combine the models with explicit logical rules and majority voting. Single-representation models reach up to 73% F1, while the ensemble reaches 78%.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

RALE (Representation-Aware Logical Ensemble) is a method for LLM-based vulnerability detection in C code. The authors train LLMs on raw source code, Abstract Syntax Trees and Control Flow Graphs, and find each representation works best for certain vulnerability classes. Combining the models with explicit logical rules and majority voting raises F1 from at most 73% for a single model to 78%, with gains in accuracy, precision and recall.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

VulDec is a dataset and framework for detecting vulnerabilities in binaries by first decompiling them with fine-tuned LLMs. The dataset aligns real-world Assembly-C function pairs across several architectures with CWE labels. Tuned neural decompilers reach about 56% Edit Similarity and 43% BLEU-4, and tuned detectors reach a macro F1 of 0.61 on a realistic test set with a 3% vulnerability rate.

arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

Provable Security of SHA-256-Based LMS Revisited in the Ideal-Cipher Model is an October 2026 ePrint paper by Chun Guo, Hao Cheng, Bart Preneel and Meiqin Wang. It shows forgery attacks on LMS_SHA256_M32 and LMS_SHA256_M24 that exploit Merkle-Damgård structure, so the Katz and Fluhrer random-oracle bounds do not apply. It proves ideal-cipher-model bounds: about 256 minus log2 of the block count for M32, and a minimum of two terms for M24.

eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🛡️ Security