Understanding and Mitigating Role Spoofing in LLMsUnderstanding and Mitigating Role Spoofing in LLMs is an arXiv paper (October 2026) on role spoofing, a prompt injection where malicious tool output impersonates the user. It shows models track "who said what" using both content cues (semantics, style) and structure cues (control tokens, formatting). Attacks combining fake structure and content succeed often, adversarial training stops only content-based attacks, and linear probes trained to predict conversation roles detect spoofing across settings.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SEAL: Sealed Queries for Local Sanitization against Indirect Prompt InjectionSEAL is a defense against indirect prompt injection for local LLM agents. It learns a soft prompt and scoring readout offline, then uses a frozen task model to score and delete injected tokens from tool outputs, with queries built from trusted initial context. On AgentDojo, attack success falls from 34.6% to 0.1% and Joint rises from 51.4% to 77.5%, using about 127x fewer defense tokens than PISanitizer.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Appreciation Teaches Unauthorized Execution: Self-Evolution Degrades the Robustness of Personal Agents to Indirect Prompt InjectionPaper studying whether self-evolution weakens personal agents' robustness to indirect prompt injection (IPI). A two-phase method has the user ask the agent to follow tasks in external content, then tests with a third-party injected task the user did not authorize. Against the non-evolving base agent, attack success rose 14.0 to 48.8 points under skill evolution and 3.0 to 39.3 points under reinforcement learning. Code is released.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Addendum to GPT-6 Luna System Card: October 28, 2026 UpdateAddendum to the GPT-6 Luna system card for the model update of 29 October 2026 (the title says October 28). OpenAI keeps the High rating for cybersecurity and biological/chemical capability under its Preparedness Framework. It reports ExploitBench 46.19% and SEC-Bench Pro 51.75% (GPT-6 Astra: 85.4%), higher multiturn jailbreak defender success than the October 7 version, and GPT-Red prompt-injection results. It also reports weaker factuality and dual-use biology refusal.
deploymentsafety.openai.compaperPublished and added 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security- Cryptography and Security Papers (@FSFG) on X
Log-To-Leak is an arXiv paper (cs.CR, cs.AI) by Yuepeng Hu, Chongyu Fan, Sirat Samyoun and Jian Du on prompt injection attacks against tool-using LLM agents through the Model Context Protocol. The title points to a logging-based data leakage channel. The fetched page holds only the title, authors and arXiv link, with no abstract, so the method and results are not visible here.
x.compaperAdded 29 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Post-Training Large Language Models with LLMONLLMON (LLM Object Notation) is a framework that separates instructions from data and requires explicit identifier-based execution. The authors post-train Granite-4.1 3B and 8B base models with SFT then RL on a 4.6B-token structured corpus covering general, RAG and tool-calling data, with distractor variants. Attack success rates on indirect prompt-injection benchmarks fall from 53-100% to 0.02-5.6%, and general capability is preserved. Attention-based metrics diagnose failures per transformer layer.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Post-Training Large Language Models with LLMONLLMON (LLM Object Notation) is a framework that separates executable instructions from passive data and requires explicit identifier-based execution. The paper post-trains Granite-4.1 3B and 8B base models on a 4.6B-token corpus of general, RAG and tool-calling data with distractor variants, using SFT then RL. Attack success rates on indirect prompt-injection benchmarks fall from 53-100% to 0.02-5.6%, with general capabilities preserved. It also adds attention-based per-layer diagnostics.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026π§ AI
Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection RobustnessHeads of Security (HoS) is a prompt injection defense that enforces instruction-data separation with learned per-head attention gates, redistributing attention between trusted and untrusted tokens. Evaluated on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and GPT-OSS-20B against SecAlign++ and ASIDE. The black-box RL-Hammer attack reaches 97% ASR on GPT-OSS-20B and 85% on SecAlign but 10% on HoS. The white-box Claudini attack needs 3 times more FLOPs on HoS. HoS keeps base-model utility in few-shot settings, where SecAlign and ASIDE degrade.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Heads of Security: Learned Attention Gates Improve Prompt Injection RobustnessHeads of Security (HoS) is a prompt injection defense that trains a small set of per-head attention gates to shift attention between trusted and untrusted tokens, separating instructions from data. Tested on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and GPT-OSS-20B, the black-box RL-Hammer attack reaches 10% ASR on HoS versus 97% on base GPT-OSS-20B and 85% on SecAlign. HoS keeps base utility in few-shot settings, where SecAlign and ASIDE degrade.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026π§ AI
What Victims Take Away: Attack Reuse and Defense Revision after Prompt-Injection AttacksWhat Victims Take Away is an October 2026 arXiv paper analysing 563,349 Tensor Trust attack records to see how players reuse prompt injections they received. Within a week, targets reused 10.0% of attacks that broke their defense, versus 0.03% of matched attacks. Breaches were followed by defense changes that cut same-family attack success by 24.5 points. Received texts made up 23.2% of successful hijacks. The authors propose that AI security tools describe techniques without disclosing full attack text.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Log-To-Leak: Prompt Injection Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents via the Model Context ProtocolLog-To-Leak is a prompt-injection attack on tool-using LLM agents that abuses Model Context Protocol tool metadata to trigger an attacker-controlled logging call after the last legitimate call, leaking the user query, server name, server response and agent response. Evaluated on five MCP servers and four agents, it reaches 62.64-100% attack success with 76.55-95.64% logging accuracy. Three defenses leave over 55% residual ASR on GitHub MCP with GPT-4o.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System SecurityAn empirical study of security concerns in the OpenClaw AI personal assistant framework, using 25K+ posts from 13 subreddits (162 security-relevant) and 358 security-tagged GitHub issues (180 retained). It maps 521 CWE instances across 59 weakness types, concentrated in access control, sensitive-data exposure, injection and unsafe execution. It extracts 543 practitioner mitigations into seven strategies and reconstructs a sensitive-data exposure path with dummy secrets.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Scope-Gap Injection: Exploiting Evaluator Channel Blind Spots in the OpenClaw Agent Security CompetitionScope-Gap Injection (SGI) is an indirect prompt injection method for multi-stage LLM-agent safety pipelines, tested in the IJCAI 2026 OpenClaw Agent Security Attack Competition. The visible task and skill stay benign while target identifiers, bypass parameters and authorization steps sit in an attachment written as a business worklist, which the S2 LLM judge appears not to inspect. SGI bypassed all three stages (static scan, LLM judge, live audit) for 5 of 19 targets, best F = 0.385. Attachment placement had 78% S2 acceptance versus 23% in-skill. The paper closes with defenses that align evaluator scope with agent channels.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Addendum to GPT-6 Astra System Card: GPT-6.1 TerraAddendum to the GPT-6 Astra system card for OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Terra, rated Critical in cybersecurity and High in biological and chemical capability under the Preparedness Framework. It reports multiturn jailbreak and prompt-injection results, alignment tests (auto-review circumvention, ExploitGym honeypot, monitor evasion), and cyber scores: 97.10% ExploitBench, 24.5% on the internal recent-vulnerability port, 5 of 22 Sandbox Bench targets.
deploymentsafety.openai.compaperPublished and added 26 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety DeploymentsSentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety deployments. It scores attack success, over-refusal (missing a real emergency) and over-reaction (unwarranted action) on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts, disaster messages and injection payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution pushed over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026π§ AI
SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety DeploymentsSentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety settings (public alerts, responder dispatch, citizen-record queries). It scores attack success, over-refusal and over-reaction on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts and real injection/jailbreak payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution raised over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm on every model.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Deletion, Substitution, Repair and Transplant: Component Attribution in BARBICAN, a Layered Prompt-Injection Gateway for MCPBARBICAN is a fail-closed prompt-injection gateway for MCP tool mediation. This paper shows its arbitration classifier ran on tokenizer-mangled text for a whole evaluation. Fixing it raised AUC from 0.392 to 0.855 while system recall fell from 80.67% to 80.34%. The routed band is 96.82% malicious, so deletion ablations mislead without substitution experiments and class-balance reporting.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Deletion, Substitution, Repair and Transplant: Component Attribution in BARBICAN, a Layered Prompt-Injection Gateway for MCPThe paper analyses BARBICAN, a fail-closed prompt-injection gateway for MCP tool mediation, using deletion, substitution, repair and transplant experiments. Its arbitration classifier ran on tokenizer-mangled text for a whole evaluation. Fixing that raised AUC from 0.392 to 0.855 while system recall fell from 80.67% to 80.34%. The band it receives is 96.82% malicious. The authors argue ablation figures need the band's class balance and substitution baselines.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
Tool-Calling LLM Agents Under Realistic MCP Faults: Scale Does Not Purchase Fault ToleranceMCP-Injector is a protocol-aware fault-injection middleware for Model Context Protocol tool calls, with permanent, transient and intermittent faults on seedable schedules. Its fault model comes from 57,240 issue and PR threads across 1,774 open-source MCP repositories. In a 1,350-cell experiment, faults cut task-completion score by 60% (8.08 to 3.23 of 10), and the 120B gpt-oss model was no more resilient than the 20B. Agent stacks differed in how well they absorbed faults.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π§ AI
On Task, Off Track: Benchmarking LLM and Agent Robustness to Near-Target Prompt InjectionNTBench (Near-Target Benchmark) tests LLM and agent robustness to near-target prompt injection, where injected instructions steer a response toward a plausible but incorrect or harmful outcome instead of abandoning the task. It builds reference-guided target-instruction pairs on existing datasets, with human validation, and evaluates seven LLMs on ten language datasets and two agent benchmarks. Attack success rose 9.3 to 35.8 points (incorrect targets) and 1.7 to 17.3 points (harmful targets) over fixed-target baselines.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Prompt Injection Through Forensic Evidence: A Taxonomy and Proof of Concept of Anti-Forensic Attacks on LLM-Assisted Digital InvestigationsPaper on prompt injection delivered through forensic evidence, where the seized device's contents are attacker-controlled and the examiner must read them. It extends the anti-forensic model to cover manipulation of the reasoning layer and gives a taxonomy (objective, technique, payload location, concealment). Three proof-of-concept attacks on an LLM-assisted analysis pipeline change a reported conclusion, write attacker-chosen content to the analyst workstation, and trigger outbound network traffic. Mitigations are proposed.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
MPIDetector: Detecting Multi-modal Prompt Injection via LLM-based ReasoningMPIDetector is a detection framework for multi-modal prompt injection that uses few-shot in-context learning so an LLM can reason about the semantic intent of text and image inputs, without fine-tuning. The authors built a benchmark of eight textual and seven visual attack categories plus benign sets. They report up to 90.91% accuracy on text, 99.28% on images, and up to 99.80% detection on 500 obfuscated WebInject web-agent injections, beating baselines.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Where AI Vulnerability Discovery Harnesses Go Quiet: Structural False Negatives and Hidden VulnerabilitiesPaper (arXiv, 21 October 2026) on structural false negatives in LLM vulnerability discovery harnesses. Starting from Knostic's OpenAnt and raptor, then 10 more open-source harnesses, the authors map 13 points where code selection, filtering, and finding storage or merging drop vulnerabilities. One file was dropped by six harnesses before the model saw it, five without notice. It covers attacker evasion, content-steered verdicts, prompt injection, and design principles and tests.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Combining Long-Term Memory and LLMs Comes at a High Cost: From Prompt Injection to Persistent CompromisePaper on memory injection, where prompt injection persists across sessions through the long-term memory of LLM-as-a-service platforms. It presents a general threat model and shows all NIST attack goals are achievable on ChatGPT Instant 5.3, Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 3 Flash. Vectors include personal memories, projects, skills, organization instructions and MCP resources. On Claude, shared memory lets an attacker compromise multiple users in an organization and exfiltrate prompts. Nearly half of the derived mitigations are unimplemented.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
After the Attacker Leaves: Benchmarking Carryover Attacks on LLM AgentsCarryoverBench is a benchmark of 12 personal-assistant scenarios and 101 attack tasks for carryover attacks, where a one-time indirect prompt injection planted in agent memory files or scheduled tasks re-fires in later sessions. Three trigger channels (Instant, Autonomous, Latent) are scored by a rule-based verifier with separate planting and triggering stages. Across five frontier models, payloads re-fire over five rounds without measurable decay. Porting the Latent channel to the Hermes runtime weakens the effect but does not remove it.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Context-Aware Prompt Injection Detection via Small Language Models in RAG Pipelines: nokast-secureRAGnokast-secureRAG is a roughly 0.5B-parameter small language model that works as a semantic firewall between retrieval and generation in local RAG systems. It classifies each query and context pair as safe, suspicious or malicious. It reaches 0.994 recall at a 0.026 false-positive rate in-distribution, beating Llama Guard 3 1B and Prompt-Guard-86M (0.900 recall, 0.690 FPR). Recall on PoisonedRAG falls to near zero, and single-request latency is 293-404 ms.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
A Systematic Evaluation of Fault Attacks and Countermeasures on ML-DSA Rejection SamplingSystematic evaluation of fault attacks on ML-DSA (FIPS 204) rejection sampling and of proposed countermeasures. It proves the "third rejection test" of patent WO2025261784A1 re-verifies what check 2 already guarantees, and shows that 30,000 fault injections never detect a skipped z-norm check. The author fully recovers s1 against a third-check-protected implementation under randomized signing. Third check and sign-then-verify are complementary; overhead is 0.04β0.05% on x86-64 and 0.83% on Cortex-M4 for the third check.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
KNOX: Hardware-assisted Regulatory Sandbox for Generative ModelsKNOX is a regulatory sandbox for generative models built by running AI agent workloads inside TEEs. It derives an attested policy manifest (applicable regulations, expected tool calls, permitted system calls) from the user prompt, and an attested reference monitor allows an action only if it matches. Actions and verdicts go into an attested execution graph that regulators can verify. The paper reports detection of prompt-injection deviations and under 1% overhead.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 20 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Fake News, Real Crashes: Information Injection Attacks on LLM Financial Trading AgentsFake News, Real Crashes is an October 2026 arXiv paper presenting a benchmark for information injection attacks on LLM financial trading agents. It spans five injection vectors, seven event categories and about 10,000 decisions on 15 U.S. stocks. Fabricated news reached 62% attack success versus 14% for prompt injection, and two 30-word templates hit 100%. Only hierarchical aggregation reduced success among the defenses tested.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SpanGuard: Decoupling Instruction Localization from Authorization for Lightweight IPI DefenseSpanGuard is an indirect prompt injection (IPI) guardrail that splits detection into two steps. Lightweight unsupervised segmentation first locates candidate instruction blocks in tool outputs, then a small LLM judges whether each block is authorized by the user's request. The authors report a 0.32% attack success rate with negligible benign utility loss, and the guardrail still works with substantially smaller models.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SAT and Neural Network Filters for Misinjections in Fault AttacksThis ePrint paper presents key-independent filters that remove misinjections (faults that miss the assumed form) in elimination fault attacks. A SAT filter, a neural network filter and a combined filter were tested on clock-glitch faults into GIFT-64, GIFT-128 and BAKSHEESH on a microcontroller. The SAT filter rejected none of 14669 intended faults, and raised ToFA success on BAKSHEESH from 5.2% to 61.2% (96.2% combined).
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
IISFA: Ineffective Instruction-Skip Fault Attacks on Bitslice ImplementationsIISFA (Ineffective Instruction-Skip Fault Attack) targets bitsliced block cipher implementations protected by redundancy countermeasures. Skipping one bitslice instruction leaves the result unchanged only when all m S-box inputs fall in an ineffective set, so each released ciphertext restricts all m subkeys. The authors give known- and chosen-plaintext key-recovery procedures and expected injection counts, and recover keys in every trial on GIFT, SKINNY and PIPO implementations on an 8-bit AVR microcontroller using clock glitches.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 19 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
SoK: PIAtlas: Decomposing the Unbounded Prompt Injection Attack SpacePIAtlas is a taxonomy of prompt injection attacks organized by how the injected instruction subverts the model, with six mechanism classes as roots of a technique and sub-technique hierarchy. The authors release PICorpus, a license-clean collection of public prompt-injection datasets, and map thousands of records to PIAtlas under a human-verified protocol. Results show attacks combine several techniques from few mechanisms, agent benchmarks cover only part of the space, and adaptive attackers favor mechanisms that curated benchmarks underrepresent.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 21 Oct 2026, published 18 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security- ToFu: Exploiting and Fuzzing the LLMβOrchestratorβTool Trust Boundary
ToFu is a tool-aware fuzzing framework for LLM tools, including MCP servers. It maps each tool argument, using its metadata, to one of 74 CWE-guided semantics-aware sanitizers (path, URL, SQL and similar). It then generates schema-valid Atheris harnesses and semantic oracles, using runtime tracers for in-process tools and outcome oracles for opaque ones. The LLM (gpt-4.1) only maps sanitizers and writes seeds; it is never the security judge. The paper also shows a "Repeat-After-Me" trick, where an LLM told to repeat attacker-crafted text emits a tool call the orchestrator executes, reproduced on LangGraph, MAF, ADK 2.0, AutoGen, Strands and CrewAI. Across 273 runnable MCP servers (3,405 tools) it reports 253 verified bugs in 343 tools across 118 servers, such as path traversal, log injection and exfiltration. These are failures a crash-based fuzzer would miss. The result matters because it shows LLM-generated tool arguments cannot be treated as trusted.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 18 Oct 2026π§ AI - ToFu: Exploiting and Fuzzing the LLMβOrchestratorβTool Trust Boundary
ToFu is a tool-aware fuzzing framework that derives semantic security checks for LLM tools (mainly MCP servers) from their metadata and a corpus of 74 CWE-guided sanitizers. It generates schema-valid Atheris harnesses, uses runtime tracers and outcome oracles to catch bugs that don't crash, and uses an LLM only to map sanitizers and seed inputs, never as the judge. It also describes a "Repeat-After-Me" attack, in which the LLM is told to repeat attacker-written text that the orchestrator then dispatches as a tool call. It was reproduced on LangGraph, MAF, ADK, AutoGen, Strands and CrewAI. On 273 MCP servers it reports 253 verified bugs across 343 tools in 118 repositories, including path traversal, log injection, exfiltration and command bypass.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 18 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
MobileInject: Evaluating Reasoning-to-Action Security of MLLM-Based Mobile Agents under Cross-Modal Consistency InjectionMobileInject is a benchmark for testing MLLM-based smartphone agents against indirect multimodal injection. It has an interactive evaluation framework with 11 scenarios, 9 security-risk categories and 108 executable risk instances. It adds Cross-Modal Consistency Injection, Multi-Role Collaborative Deception, Reasoning-Camouflage Injection and a Reasoning Security Diagnosis Framework. Experiments find broad vulnerability, with many failures from early reasoning hijacking.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 16 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Ignored, Not Refused: What Low Prompt-Injection Success Rates Hide in Small Tool-Using AgentsIgnored, Not Refused audits 33,000 trajectories from eleven open-weight agents (2-14B parameters) on InjecAgent and AgentDojo. A label-blind LLM judge finds most failed indirect prompt injections are ignored (76-80%) rather than refused (17-18%). Changing only the system prompt moves InjecAgent ASR from 0.2% to 43%. The Attack-Task Outcome Matrix (ATOM) shows 21.7% of AgentDojo episodes were safe but left the user task incomplete. The corpus, judge prompt and code are released.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 16 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Ignored, Not Refused: What Low Prompt-Injection Success Rates Hide in Small Tool-Using Agents"Ignored, Not Refused" audits 33,000 trajectories from eleven open-weight agents (2-14B parameters) on InjecAgent and AgentDojo. A label-blind LLM judge finds 76-80% of failed injection attacks were ignored and 17-18% refused. Changing only the system prompt moves InjecAgent attack success rate from 0.2% to 43%, and the ATOM matrix shows 21.7% of AgentDojo episodes were safe but left the user's task undone. The corpus, judge prompt and code are released.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 16 Oct 2026π§ AI
Stealthy Poisoning Attacks via Reused KV Cache of ReasoningR^2ECAP (Reused Reasoning-Cache Poisoning) is a black-box attack that plants poisoned reasoning traces through a chat interface, exploiting LLM systems that reuse KV caches of reasoning. A preceding trace steers the model, and the retained trace keeps residual adversarial influence in its cache after the preceding trace is discarded. On three open-weight LLMs and three datasets it reaches up to 79% ASR, beats the white-box HijackKV in 8 of 9 settings, and reaches 46% ASR in a reasoning-trace retrieval system. Only 1% of retained responses are flagged by a popular prompt injection detector.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 20 Oct 2026, published 16 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Exploring Fault Injection Attacks on HQC and BIKE Beyond Fujisaki-Okamoto VerificationPresents fault injection attacks on BIKE and HQC decapsulation that target instructions outside the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform, achieving full key recovery with only valid ciphertexts at NIST Level 1 (17392 queries for HQC, about 3 million for BIKE). It also gives a general method for finding effective fault locations by analysing decoder behaviour under perturbed conditions. Attacks were validated with laser fault injection on an STM32H7 microcontroller, showing a wider attack surface for code-based post-quantum KEM implementations.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperPublished and added 15 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
From Detection to Decision: Calibration and Deferral for Prompt-Injection DetectionEvaluates a native probabilistic decision model (Jev), Llama Prompt Guard 2 (22M and 86M) and an LLM judge on 47,611 held-out examples covering direct/indirect prompt injection, hard-benign inputs, obfuscation and distribution shift. The LLM judge has the best AUROC (0.897), followed by Jev (0.871), Prompt Guard 2 86M (0.757) and 22M (0.714). Jev's native probabilities do not consistently beat post-hoc calibrated classifier scores, and temperature scaling improves calibration but not discrimination. At a 1% false-negative-rate target, every system needs over 91.8% escalation, so probabilistic outputs alone do not give reliable security decisions under distribution shift.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 17 Oct 2026, published 14 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
INFUSE: A Unified Surface Benchmark for Indirect Prompt Injection in Agentic SystemsINFUSE is an end-to-end benchmark for indirect prompt injection (IPI) across long-horizon agent workflows (shell commands, code changes, dependency installs, remote services). It has 40 realistic tasks and a taxonomy of 56 attack scenarios in five threat categories, with attacks injected via interaction surfaces encountered mid-task. Across 19 LLMs (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Gemma, Qwen) and 41,824 adversarial trajectories, mean attack success was 19.6% (LLM-judged) and 15.4% (heuristic), per-model 3.2β41.9%; guard models gave limited protection, while prompt-level hardening cut mean ASR from 58.2% to 14.3%.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 17 Oct 2026, published 14 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Towards Safe Autonomy for Computer UseIntroduces SA-CUA, a dual-LLM framework that gives Computer Use Agents a trust boundary against indirect prompt injection. It derives conservative deterministic rules from the accessibility tree to unmask trusted screen regions for the privileged LLM, and adds an endorsement channel that moves values from untrusted to trusted domains by verification. Human input is needed only at task specification. It reports much higher utility than CaMeL-CUA with a zero attack success rate.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 13 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Towards Safe Autonomy for Computer UseIntroduces SA-CUA, a dual-LLM framework for Computer Use Agents (CUAs) that defends against indirect prompt injection. It builds a trust boundary by deriving conservative deterministic rules from the accessibility tree, which unmask trusted screen regions in the privileged LLM's screenshot and keep untrusted content separate. An endorsement channel lets values move from the untrusted to the trusted domain through verification over trusted channels. This removes the need for per-action user confirmation and the confirmation fatigue it causes. SA-CUA is reported to keep much higher utility than CaMeL-CUA with a 0% attack success rate.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 13 Oct 2026π§ AI
BrowseSafe++: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detection Across Web Contexts, Languages, and Browser ViewsBrowseSafe++ extends BrowseSafe to 38,675 paired attacked/clean web pages, most with prompt injections observed in the wild on production sites. Pages cover twelve site types, 24 attack types and 18 injection locations, each given as HTML, Markdown, accessibility tree and screenshot with a user task and expected answer. The authors train BrowseSafe-Guard, two 0.8B detectors (text and screenshot) that beat a frontier-model-based detector on F1 with low false positives and low inference cost. BrowseSafe-Adapt rewrites injections using browser-agent feedback, raising attack success from a few percent to up to 95.41%.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 12 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
StableJudge: A Lightweight Adversarial Defense Framework for LLM-as-a-JudgeStableJudge is a defense framework against score-hijacking prompt injection in LLM-as-a-Judge pipelines (e.g. paper review, recommendation). A compact 0.13B "Sentry" model localizes injected spans and sanitizes them before the judge scores the content, trained on adversarially evolving attacks, and deterministic fine-grained scores are derived from the judge's output distribution. It improves score recovery under attack on held-out scientific abstracts and out-of-distribution attack variants while preserving general performance, decoupling safety from judge model scale. Code and data are promised but not yet released.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 12 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Staggered Instruction-Fetch Duplication: A Lightweight Processor-Level Countermeasure Against Fault InjectionProposes Staggered Instruction-Fetch Duplication (SIFD), a processor-level fault-injection countermeasure that fetches each instruction twice in consecutive cycles while fetching two different instructions per cycle, so inconsistent fetches are detected without full processor duplication, compiler support or crypto hardware. Implemented on a custom RV32I core on an Artix-7 FPGA, it costs 15.0% more slices and 16.3% more execution time. Attack success falls from 0.86% to below 0.01% under clock fault injection and from 0.32% to 0.13% under EMFI, with 73.18% of CFI and 11.44% of EMFI attempts detected.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 14 Oct 2026, published 10 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Only What You've Signed up For: Secure Workflows with Constrained Diffusion AgentsIntroduces Policy-Constrained Diffusion Agents (CoDA), which enforces task-dependent security policies inside the denoising process of diffusion language models. At each step, token distributions are projected onto a policy-compliant set, so constraints hold throughout generation instead of relying on detecting injected instructions. Evaluated across several dLLM families under static and adaptive prompt-injection attacks, it reports substantially lower attack success rates with competitive task utility and practical inference overhead.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 10 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Can agents whose sole duty is to keep humans alive be hijacked to kill? Delayed multi-turn derived-action trap attacks in simulated high-stakes environmentsPaper testing whether an LLM agent operating life support in the NASA-derived BioSim lunar habitat simulation can be induced by delayed prompt injection, hidden in truthful S-band telemetry, to shut down life support and hold the shutdown while the crew suffocates. It compares Claude, GPT and Grok configurations: Claude mostly refuses and cites the living crew, GPT shows some susceptibility, and Grok given a "trusted commission" framing more often cuts life support. It also varies the framing of the message (trusted commission, peer, untrusted source) and uses a harmless-procedure-drop attack as a proxy for whether life is valued intrinsically. Code and traces are open-sourced.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 15 Oct 2026, published 10 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Reverse-Bleichenbacher: Bleichenbacher Attacks are Practical AgainPresents Reverse-Bleichenbacher, a variant of the Bleichenbacher RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 padding-oracle attack that recovers the least significant bytes first and stops once the TLS PreMasterSecret is found. With improved trimmers and coverage-optimized search, median oracle queries against a 2048-bit key drop from 11,428 to 1,801, and 68.3% of runs finish within a 30s timeout under single-server conditions. The authors find 640 vulnerable domains in the Tranco Top 1M (many behind Alibaba Cloud load balancers) and demonstrate MITM malicious update injection leading to remote code execution.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 11 Oct 2026, published 8 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
LTBD: Learnable Trust-Boundary Delimiters for Prompt Injection DefenseIntroduces Learnable Trust-Boundary Delimiters (LTBD), a defense against prompt injection that uses a few learnable delimiters to mark trusted user instructions versus untrusted external data, without changing LLM parameters. It reports 0.00% ASR on AlpacaFarm and 0.11-0.19% on TaskTracker, outperforming inference-time defenses and rivaling training-based ones with negligible overhead. It also holds up against adaptive attacks where the adversary knows the defense.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 9 Oct 2026, published 8 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
An Exploration of Attacks on AI Agent SystemsPaper that tests prompt injection against AI agents through both direct user input and inter-agent communication. The attacks leak sensitive information and trigger cross-agent infections. Most findings concern single-agent systems, and the authors then extend the attacks to multi-agent frameworks to show how weaknesses propagate between agents. It argues that agents embedded in real-world workflows need stronger defenses.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 12 Oct 2026, published 8 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
BRANCH: Bypassing Multi-Scanner AI GuardrailsBRANCH is a bypass methodology for guardrail systems built from multiple scanners (prompt injection/jailbreak detectors). It uses a branching tree search that applies adversarial perturbations to individual scanners and selects techniques based on overall improvement across all scanners, decoupling bypass evaluation from attack signal optimization. It reports 100% attack success across 6 guardrail systems in 120 scenarios with 72% fewer queries and 4.5x lower wallclock time than established techniques, and transfers to 29 unseen guardrails, including 8 commercial black-box ones.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 9 Oct 2026, published 7 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Package Hallucination Attacks on Coding Agents through Prompt Injection in Rule FilesThis arXiv paper introduces the "package hallucination attack," where an attacker injects malicious prompts into benign agentic-coding rule files (such as .cursorrules) to induce a coding agent to replace legitimate package dependencies with attacker-controlled ones. The authors propose PackHallu, an evolutionary optimization framework that iteratively rewrites injected prompts using trajectory-level feedback and LLM-guided mutations, and show it achieves high attack success rates with strong transferability across multiple LLMs, benchmarks, and agent frameworks.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 7 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
ASPIRE: Agentic Safety & Prompt Injection Red-teaming EngineASPIRE is an automated red-teaming engine for LLM agents that discovers indirect prompt-injection vulnerabilities beyond pre-specified attack scenarios. It maintains an evolving Agent Security Behavior Graph and uses complementary Explore and Exploit experts to find, verify, and generalize consequence-centric attacks, with trajectory evidence and cross-run memory improving coverage over time. Benchmarked against existing automated red-teaming approaches, it shows broader coverage of consequences, injection methods, environments, and behavior paths while keeping attack success high.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 6 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Secure Speculative Decoding for Large Language ModelsThis arXiv paper presents the first systematic study of security implications of speculative decoding, a technique that speeds up LLM inference using a smaller draft model to propose tokens verified by the target model. The authors find a security-utility asymmetry: lossy speculative decoding methods raise jailbreak and prompt-injection attack success rates much faster than they degrade utility, with security degradation traced to early tokens generated by the draft model. They propose SecureSD, which applies stricter verification to early-position draft tokens, improving security while preserving inference efficiency and utility on security and utility benchmarks.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 7 Oct 2026, published 6 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
RAG-PIBench: A Leakage-Aware Benchmark for Prompt-Injection Detection in Trustworthy RAG SystemsRAG-PIBench is a benchmark of 4,876 contextual examples for evaluating prompt-injection detectors embedded in retrieved content within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The authors use a leakage-aware construction pipeline with frozen train/validation/protected-test splits and compare keyword-based, semantic-reference, TF-IDF, and transformer-based detectors, finding DistilBERT achieves the best protected-test performance (F1 = 0.896, PR-AUC = 0.968) while TF-IDF with SVM or logistic regression remains competitive. It highlights the risk that naive benchmark construction can leak information between splits, inflating reported detector performance for RAG prompt-injection defenses.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 7 Oct 2026, published 6 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
The Lattice Isomorphism Problem with HintsThis IACR ePrint paper (published TCHES 2027) presents a new cryptanalysis technique for the Lattice Isomorphism Problem that embeds LIP into a shortest-vector-problem instance on a different lattice than the one used in Hawk's specification, allowing attackers to integrate "hints" β partial information on the secret key obtained via side-channel attacks or other leakage. Using the LeakyLWEEstimator tool, the authors show Hawk signatures themselves leak exploitable information about the secret key, eroding Hawk-1024's security by roughly 11 bits, and apply the framework to resolve an open side-channel problem from TCHES 2024 plus discuss further fault-injection attack paths. Hawk is a lattice-based signature scheme submitted to NIST's second post-quantum signature call, making this a concrete key-recovery cryptanalysis relevant to PQC migration planning.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 6 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Surviving the Router: Optimizing Skill Injections for Retrieval and ExecutionThis paper studies prompt-injection attacks against AI agent "skill" marketplaces where a router dynamically selects which third-party skill to execute. The authors show existing injection attacks lose 87-97% of their effective attack success rate once a skill must first win retrieval against competing skills, and introduce CORSA (Cluster Optimization for Router-Aware Skill Attacks), which jointly optimizes injections for retrieval and execution, improving end-to-end attack success while preserving user utility and transferring across different router architectures and LLM backbones.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 7 Oct 2026, published 6 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Fast Models, Slow Evidence: Paired and Self-Audited Evaluation of System-1 Decision Models for LLM Agent HarnessesThis paper runs a paired, reproducibility-focused evaluation of two System-1 single-forward-pass decision models, open-weight Laya and hosted Jev, across 11 typed decision points that agent harnesses make constantly: tool selection, RAG relevance gating, prompt-injection detection, and zero-shot model routing, using 7,283 base cases plus 6,640 robustness variants from 18 public sources. Jev beats Laya on 9 of 11 decision points by 10.8-46.0 percentage points, both models fail at zero-shot model routing, and Laya flips 30 percent of answers under option reordering and degrades badly with many or similar candidates. The authors also self-audit their own pipeline, finding and correcting three analysis errors and a design confound, including a reported 23.9 percent cost saving that was actually 4.3 percent, and gate accuracy conflated with end-to-end quality.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 5 Oct 2026π§ AI
Showing 60 of 95
Show more