Skip to content

393 results for “pi”

What you seeeverything
  1. Your Benchmark Is an Empirical Measure Over Difficulty

    The paper treats a benchmark as an empirical measure over item difficulty and formalizes two failure modes: measure mismatch (benchmark difficulty distribution differs from the intended one) and coverage gaps (uncovered difficulty regions that hide localized training progress). It proposes two diagnostic metrics with theoretical guarantees and analyzes 25 popular benchmarks across 7 domains using estimated item difficulties. It also introduces BenchFill, a difficulty-targeted item rewriting algorithm that reduces local coverage gaps.

    huggingface.copaperAdded 31 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  2. WorkFactory: Turning Professional Intents into Executable Work for Scalable Agent Training

    WorkFactory is a framework that builds coherent, executable professional tasks for training working agents. It plans an information support graph from professional intents, then uses probe executions to find and repair missing or inconsistent task information. The authors built 112,686 tasks across 612 occupations and fine-tuned Qwen models at 4B, 27B and 35B-A3B (WorkPilot). WorkPilot-35B-A3B rose from 879 to 1565 Elo on GDPval-AA v2.1.

    huggingface.copaperAdded 30 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  3. world2vec: Mechanistic world models through latent dynamics learning

    world2vec is a method for learning mechanistic world models from observations and actions alone, without reward information. Its latent dynamics reproduce the true system over long prediction horizons using at least one order of magnitude fewer parameters than DreamerV3, TD-MPC2 and LeWM. The authors report state-of-the-art control of continuous environments from pixels and accurate system identification across a benchmark of 71 attractors.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  4. RADIOlogy: A Single-Pass Approach to Training-Free Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection

    RADIOlogy is a training-free, single-pass zero-shot anomaly detection method that uses multi-head attention pooling in vision-language models. It scores anomalies by contrasting average similarity between vision features and sets of normal and abnormal prompts, with no windowed execution. RADIO agglomerative features drive a dense refinement pipeline for pixel-level segmentation, and the method is applied to medical images.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  5. VeriCUA: Verification as Agentic Exploration for Computer-Using Agents

    VeriCUA is a platform-agnostic framework that verifies task completion by computer-using agents through agentic exploration. The verifier inspects context to build a task rubric, then picks GUI or code checks for unresolved requirements and combines findings under explicit evidence rules. It works online and offline across desktop, mobile and web, and agrees better with reference labels than the baselines, with the largest offline gains on hard cases.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  6. Agentic LLM reasoning in pediatric diabetes outcome prediction from multimodal medical records

    CEDAR (Clinical Evidence-Driven Agent for Risk-prediction) is an evidence-citing, self-auditing LLM pipeline for predicting pediatric diabetes outcomes at 24 months from 18 months of records. On 2,489 youth with type 2 diabetes and 4,018 with type 1, pooled AUROC was 0.815 versus 0.656 to 0.700 for trained ML in T2D, and 0.756 versus 0.603 to 0.631 in T1D. Only 4 of 70,246 cited values mismatched the chart. Two pediatric endocrinologists matched its predictions in about nine of ten cases.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  7. The Athlete as a Scientist of One: Agentic Bayesian Experimental Design for Individualized Physiology from Consumer Wearables

    EpiCoach is an agentic system that treats one cross-country mountain biker as an N-of-1 experiment. Claims live in an evidence-gated hypothesis registry, and each must make a probabilistic prediction before a session. Predictions come from a digital twin fitted to heart rate, GPS and altitude. In a replay over eighteen months the twin beat standard forecasters on heart rate but not segment time, and the agent loop matched a static model. In the first three live weeks, the ledger sealed 20 predictions and scored 14, and a safety officer vetoed the agent twice. The registry, benchmark and protocol are released.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  8. Don't Lose the Thread: Empowering Long-Horizon LLM Agents with Cognitive Resource Self-Allocation

    CORAL (Cognitive Resource Self-Allocation) is an agent-callable working-memory toolset that lets an LLM agent checkpoint task progress and verified facts, then reset its cluttered context and resume from a clean state. A Multi-episode Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization algorithm trains the checkpointing. With an 8B model it reaches 42.8% average accuracy on GAIA, uses 6-7x fewer input tokens than a ReAct agent, and adds 8.0 points to a proprietary agent on BrowseComp.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  9. Decompose, Estimate, Select: Coverage-Aware Context Construction for Long-Form RAG

    Decompose, Estimate, Select is a coverage-aware retrieval pipeline for long-form RAG. It splits a query into subquestions, ranks candidates with a coverage-trained bi-encoder, predicts a document-by-subquestion coverage matrix with a cross-encoder, and picks documents by greedy maximum-marginal coverage. On TREC RAG 2024, α-nDCG@10 rises from 0.625 to 0.702 (gold-nugget bound 0.718). A grounded self-feedback loop raises V_strict by 0.086 over two passes.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  10. Turing LLM Post-Training: Calibrated Distillation and Efficient Dynamic-MoE Execution

    Turing LLM post-training combines calibrated multi-teacher on-policy distillation (C-MOPD) with an execution path for dynamically routed mixture-of-experts models. C-MOPD matches each teacher on a local Top-K support with teacher-wise loss normalization and clipping. On Turing-20B-A2B it scores 0.9988 on four-domain integration, beats Qwen3-8B on math and code (85.92 vs 80.33 mean), and cuts consolidation step time from 398.7 to 139.3 seconds in a PPU profile.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  11. SEAL: Sealed Queries for Local Sanitization against Indirect Prompt Injection

    SEAL is a defense against indirect prompt injection for local LLM agents. It learns a soft prompt and scoring readout offline, then uses a frozen task model to score and delete injected tokens from tool outputs, with queries built from trusted initial context. On AgentDojo, attack success falls from 34.6% to 0.1% and Joint rises from 51.4% to 77.5%, using about 127x fewer defense tokens than PISanitizer.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  12. REALM: Identifying Minimal Task Assets for LLM Agents

    REALM (Required Execution Assets Linked to a Mission) is an approach to applying least privilege to LLM agents by identifying the assets a task needs, including ones discovered at runtime. It models assets as Dependency Graph nodes, separates discovering an asset from authorizing it, and exposes resource-bound Partial APIs inside a Task Container. On AgentDyn with qwen3.5-flash, attack success rate falls from 16.6% to 0.2%, with 40.0% task completion on clean tasks and 36.4% on injected cases.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  13. Appreciation Teaches Unauthorized Execution: Self-Evolution Degrades the Robustness of Personal Agents to Indirect Prompt Injection

    Paper studying whether self-evolution weakens personal agents' robustness to indirect prompt injection (IPI). A two-phase method has the user ask the agent to follow tasks in external content, then tests with a third-party injected task the user did not authorize. Against the non-evolving base agent, attack success rose 14.0 to 48.8 points under skill evolution and 3.0 to 39.3 points under reinforcement learning. Code is released.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  14. Shor's algorithm compiled on cat qubits: 22 593 qubits for RSA-2048 in 3.14 days

    Shor's algorithm compiled on cat qubits is an IACR ePrint (2026/2665) giving an end-to-end resource estimate on superconducting cat qubits, using repetition and LDPC cat codes. Factoring RSA-2048 needs about 23,000 cat qubits and 3.14 days, assuming phase-flip noise p_Z = 5e-4 and no bit-flips. secp256k1 ECDLP needs at most 30,000 qubits and 1 hour. A space-for-time trade runs RSA-2048 in 1.25 hours on about 611,000 qubits.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperPublished and added 28 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  15. When LLM Architectures Meet Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: a Replication Study

    This paper replicates Chen et al.'s study of LLM-based smart contract vulnerability detection, first on GPT-4 and then on Mixture-of-Experts, RNN-like and State Space Models. The exact replication confirms the high-recall, low-precision pattern on GPT-4. The differentiated replication finds the pattern does not transfer uniformly: GPT-4 and Gemma-3 behave alike despite a roughly 100x parameter gap, while two MoE models diverge.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  16. When LLM Architectures Meet Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: a Replication Study

    This arXiv paper (October 2026) replicates Chen et al.'s study of LLM-based smart contract vulnerability detection. It confirms the high-recall, low-precision pattern on GPT-4, then tests Mixture-of-Experts and RNN-like models plus a preliminary State Space Model run. Gemma-3 matches GPT-4's profile despite far fewer parameters, while two Mixture-of-Experts models diverge, so architecture family alone does not predict detection behavior.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  17. Think Before You Act: Decision Gate for LLM Agents

    JevAct is a runtime verification framework that intercepts selected LLM agent actions before execution and returns feedback for bounded revision. It compiles domain policies into executable state checks and structured questions scored by a prefill-only decision model, giving probability-based judgments without generation. Tested on eleven agents with tau^2-bench Airline and Telecom and BFCL, it gained consistently on Telecom and BFCL and was mixed on Airline.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  18. Repairs for Whom? Evaluator-Executor Mismatch in Selecting Repairs for Failed LLM Agents

    Repairs for Whom? studies single-step repairs of failed LLM agent trajectories and asks whether common evaluators (greedy replay, stronger models, oracles, log-reading judges) pick repairs that help the deployed agent. Using independent rollouts in ALFWorld and WebShop, greedy replay loses 0.06-0.13 in expected gain, and Qwen2.5-14B rollouts misselect repairs for Qwen2.5-7B. The authors recommend verifying repairs with the executor that will run them.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  19. CALM: Conflict-Aware Lifecycle Memory Governance for Long-Horizon Language Agents

    CALM is a conflict-aware lifecycle memory governance framework for long-horizon language agents. It turns records into evidence-grounded memory cells, updates their validity and lifecycle states from support, conflict and dependency signals, and admits evidence at query time through training-free or learned gating based on temporal applicability. It beats baselines on LongMemEval-S and LoCoMo with Qwen and GPT backbones, and keeping superseded records helps earlier-state reasoning.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  20. From Leniency to Suspicion: How an Open Post-Training Recipe Changes Whom LLM Fact-Checkers Believe

    This paper measures job-based doubt in LLM fact-checkers: judging a claim false more often when the poster has a lower-status job. It compares base and post-trained checkpoints of six model families on fact-checked claims with randomised poster profiles. Only the open Tülu-3 recipe (OLMo-2 32B, Tülu-3 70B) creates the effect, under one percentage point but reliable. In OLMo-2 32B the flip comes from one residual-stream direction and appears at supervised fine-tuning, confirmed on 400 new claims. None of seven commercial models doubts lower-status posters more.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  21. Statistical Detection of Positional Bias in LLM-Based Recommender Systems: Methodologies and Empirical Evidence

    The paper proposes POB-ICM (contingency matrix with Chi-square independence testing) and POB-UNBP (a uniformity null model under permutation-based evaluation) to detect positional bias in top-1, single-turn LLM recommenders. On a RAG product-recommendation testbed with 2000 queries and 20 permutations each (40,000 instances), both methods reject positional independence in all evaluated models. Three metrics quantify the effect, and the bias persists across candidate-set size and temperature. Code is public.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  22. Locating Sycophancy Across Training Stages in Open Language Models

    Locating Sycophancy Across Training Stages in Open Language Models measures sycophancy in 13 open checkpoints from 5 lineages, from base model through supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization to release. It finds two behaviors with different origins: deference to a claim in the prompt exists in every base model, while capitulation under user objection is largely absent from base models and present in every post-trained checkpoint. Post-trained models often drop firmly held answers as readily as loosely held ones when the objection names an alternative.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  23. Scaling Laws for Tool-Use Agents via Controllable Environment Synthesis

    SynthAPI is a pipeline that generates synthetic tool-use environments with explicit control over diversity of tools, tasks and underlying databases. Across 458,752 tasks and 849 trained models of four sizes, the authors fit a scaling law predicting downstream agent generalization. At larger data budgets, scaling tool and database diversity beats adding more tasks, and higher complexity helps more. Agents trained this way beat prior synthetic-data baselines on four benchmarks.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  24. EnvSched: Environment-Aware Scheduling for Rollout-Efficient Agent Reinforcement Learning

    EnvSched is an online scheduler for agentic reinforcement learning that picks which environment-task pairs to roll out next. It builds a dual-relation graph over environments and tasks, propagates past rollout statistics to predict within-task reward variance, and adds environment quotas and a similarity penalty. On Qwen3-8B it scores 48.81 average on BFCL-v3, tau-Bench and ACEBench-Agent after 40 steps, above random selection at 120 steps.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  25. As the Story Unfolds: Watching a Film and Identifying Characters as a Human Does

    This paper defines a character naming task for films: given a name spoken in dialogue and its video context, the model must pick which visible character bears that name. It provides a dataset with annotations for character naming and first appearances, a video-and-dialogue model, and a comparison with proprietary multimodal LLMs. It also proposes a progressive framework that builds a character bank as the film plays, without cast lists or actor photographs.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  26. FeatureArc: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Evolving Features

    FeatureArc is a benchmark for coding agents on evolving features, built by a pipeline that mines repository histories into multi-stage tasks across four programming languages. It has 73 manually reviewed tasks of 2 to 10 stages, validated with fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass tests. Across 10 agents, pooled success drops from 62.7% at the first stage to 28.5% for the whole feature. Inherited defects appear in 72.9% of failed later stages.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  27. OpenGray: a benchmark for evaluating the decisions of radiotherapy planning agents

    OpenGray is a benchmark that adds tasks with known correct decisions to the OpenKBP-Opt head-and-neck dataset, including two overlap contradictions with provably incompatible dose goals and a feasible control. Four planning systems, from a rule-based script to a full LLM agent, were tested on 30 patients with Terra and Ministral 3 8B. Decision accuracy reached 95.4% and 92.1%, yet only 50% and 25% of overlap contradictions were escalated. SAGE logs of 39 radiosurgery runs showed an agent that lacked an action for stopping.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  28. p-DCIM: A 28nm Probabilistic SRAM DCIM based Ising Machine for Near-Memory Context Selection in LLM-RAG Pipeline

    p-DCIM is a 28 nm SRAM digital compute-in-memory macro (0.16 mm2, 0.41 mW) that works as an Ising machine for RAG evidence selection. Selection is cast as a QUBO problem, and the same MAC datapath computes embedding similarities and annealing steps. Replacing LLM reranking with it gives a selection-energy estimate over six orders of magnitude lower and cuts total energy per query by 67%, with comparable token-level F1 on the evaluated examples.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  29. Trial by Trace: Benchmarking AI Agent Harnesses for Reliability and Failure Attribution

    TraceTrial-Bench is a benchmark that scores agent task performance and agent harness reliability separately. It has 95 mechanism-oriented tasks across seven components: context, execution, governance, lifecycle, observability, tools and verification. Across 4 harnesses, 9 models and 3,420 runs, macro-averaged harness scores range from 59.8% to 72.0%, and 31.1% of runs succeed despite failing at least one harness criterion.

    huggingface.copaperAdded 27 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  30. Your Wish Is My Commit: Over-Compliant Refactoring in AI Coding Agents

    Your Wish Is My Commit is a controlled study of over-compliant refactoring in Codex and Claude Code, run across five models, 50 algorithmic tasks and 10 object-oriented tasks. Over 3,000 turns of repeated "refactor further" prompts, no model stopped on its own: each rewrote up to 31x the original codebase before first stopping and resumed edits after declaring the task complete. The paper defines six behavioral signals for detecting over-compliance.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  31. Analyzing Compiler-induced Constant-time Violations with Compiler at Scale

    CTGREP is a compiler-based framework that applies differential analysis across the whole Clang/LLVM compilation chain to find where, how and under which configurations compiler optimizations break constant-time cryptographic code. Applied to seven libraries, three Clang versions, six targets and thousands of configurations, it led to 48 cases fixed with developers. It also identified seven new problematic LLVM passes and bypassed existing compiler-flag mitigations.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  32. Cheap AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering and What It Will Do

    "Cheap AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering and What It Will Do" is an October 2026 arXiv paper (Computers and Society) arguing that generative AI strains the law of reverse engineering. AI systems can identify hardware components, extract firmware, decompile object code and clone apps, which removes the cost barrier that laws rely on. The authors map these practices onto trade secret, copyright, anti-circumvention, computer misuse and contract law, and sketch possible legal responses with their trade-offs.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  33. Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System Security

    An empirical study of security concerns in the OpenClaw AI personal assistant framework, using 25K+ posts from 13 subreddits (162 security-relevant) and 358 security-tagged GitHub issues (180 retained). It maps 521 CWE instances across 59 weakness types, concentrated in access control, sensitive-data exposure, injection and unsafe execution. It extracts 543 practitioner mitigations into seven strategies and reconstructs a sensitive-data exposure path with dummy secrets.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  34. Scope-Gap Injection: Exploiting Evaluator Channel Blind Spots in the OpenClaw Agent Security Competition

    Scope-Gap Injection (SGI) is an indirect prompt injection method for multi-stage LLM-agent safety pipelines, tested in the IJCAI 2026 OpenClaw Agent Security Attack Competition. The visible task and skill stay benign while target identifiers, bypass parameters and authorization steps sit in an attachment written as a business worklist, which the S2 LLM judge appears not to inspect. SGI bypassed all three stages (static scan, LLM judge, live audit) for 5 of 19 targets, best F = 0.385. Attachment placement had 78% S2 acceptance versus 23% in-skill. The paper closes with defenses that align evaluator scope with agent channels.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  35. Private Information Retrieval with Accountability at Erasure-Optimal Server Redundancy

    SynTrace is a single-round compiler that adds accountability to linear private information retrieval (PIR). The client mixes the retrieval query with m audit queries, so audit syndromes identify up to d deviating servers among t colluding ones before reconstruction. The paper proves perfect query privacy and zero false identification within the threshold. For Shamir-based PIR it needs k=t+d+1 servers. For a 32 KiB record from a 1 GiB database it uses 2.25 MiB, against 8.96 MiB for the Eriguchi, Kurosawa and Nuida (TCC 2022) homomorphic-MAC construction.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperPublished and added 26 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  36. SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety Deployments

    SentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety deployments. It scores attack success, over-refusal (missing a real emergency) and over-reaction (unwarranted action) on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts, disaster messages and injection payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution pushed over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  37. SentryBench: A Cost-Sensitive Benchmark for Adversarial Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents in Public-Safety Deployments

    SentryBench is a benchmark for tool-using LLM agents in public-safety settings (public alerts, responder dispatch, citizen-record queries). It scores attack success, over-refusal and over-reaction on a cost-sensitive frontier, using real emergency-call transcripts and real injection/jailbreak payloads. Across 840 episodes on three frontier models and three defenses, refuse-more caution raised over-refusal to 100 percent on two models, while a trust-gating wrapper gave the lowest harm on every model.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  38. UTS #39: Unicode Security Mechanisms

    UTS #39 (Unicode Security Mechanisms) is the Unicode Consortium's technical standard for detecting identifier spoofing. It defines the General, IDN and Email security profiles for identifiers, confusable detection through skeleton and bidiSkeleton mappings, and mixed-script detection with resolved script sets and Restriction Levels. It also covers limited contexts for ZWJ/ZWNJ and the confusables and identifier data files. The fetched text is truncated, so later sections are not covered.

    unicode.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  39. SymLift: Neural Semantic Lifting for Compile-Free Vulnerability Detection in Context-Incomplete Code Fragments

    SymLift is a compile-free vulnerability detection framework for context-incomplete code fragments. A fine-tuned LLM lifts control-flow, data-flow, memory and resource relations into a constrained LLVM-like IR. A parser turns the IR into facts, and Datalog rules derive findings with derivation traces. On Juliet function-level fragments Clang compilation success falls to 12.00%, while SymLift's completion rate drops only 1.17 points. SymLift-Qwen-7B reaches Target-F1 94.41% on FormAI and 91.66% micro-F1 on MegaVul.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  40. SymLift: Neural Semantic Lifting for Compile-Free Vulnerability Detection in Context-Incomplete Code Fragments

    SymLift is a compile-free vulnerability detection framework for code fragments that lack project context. A fine-tuned LLM reconstructs control-flow, data-flow, memory and resource relations as a constrained LLVM-like IR, and a deterministic parser turns it into facts for Datalog rules that give findings with derivation traces. SymLift-Qwen-7B reaches 94.41% Target-F1 on FormAI and 91.66% micro-averaged Target-F1 on MegaVul.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  41. Maximum-Likelihood Decoding of Gabidulin Codes Is NP-Hard Even in Dimension One

    Philippe Gaborit proves that maximum-likelihood decoding of Gabidulin codes is NP-hard even for dimension one: deciding rank distance at most n-2 from the code {λg} is NP-complete. The reduction is deterministic, so Rank Syndrome Decoding and Rank Minimum Distance for F_{q^m}-linear codes are NP-complete under deterministic reductions, where the earlier reduction was randomized. It goes through a new pivot problem, Twisted Square Membership.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  42. Detecting and Understanding Ambiguity in Visualizations with Role-Playing Vision Language Model Interpretations

    This paper presents a pipeline that uses persona-conditioned vision language models to surface interpretive ambiguity in visualizations. Topic-relevant personas elicit candidate takeaways, and a Target-Pattern-Scope framework lets LLM judges label statement pairs as Compatible, Disjoint or Opposing, which are summarized in an ambiguity profile. The authors benchmark VLMs on chart comprehension per chart type, check labeling against human annotations, and run case studies on public visualizations and a redesign.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 25 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  43. Sliding Networks: A Family of Residual Structures Preserving Feature Learning and Feature Diversity

    Sliding Networks is a family of residual network structures with a joint width and depth scaling recipe that keeps both locally maximal feature learning and feature diversity in the residual stream. The key quantity is the ratio N_flat/(N_sharp L) tending to a constant alpha, and Half Copy correlated initialization can relax the shape constraints. Residual-MLP experiments support an SDE limit, but language-model experiments show performance differences under regrouping at fixed parameter count.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  44. VulDec: Vulnerability Detection in Binaries via Neural Decompilation

    VulDec is a dataset and framework for detecting vulnerabilities in binaries by first decompiling them with fine-tuned LLMs. The dataset aligns real-world Assembly-C function pairs across several architectures with CWE labels. Tuned neural decompilers reach about 56% Edit Similarity and 43% BLEU-4, and tuned detectors reach a macro F1 of 0.61 on a realistic test set with a 3% vulnerability rate.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  45. VulDec: Vulnerability Detection in Binaries via Neural Decompilation

    VulDec is an arXiv paper (October 2026) presenting a dataset of real-world Assembly-C function pairs with CWE labels across multiple architectures, plus an end-to-end framework that uses neural decompilation for binary vulnerability detection. Tuned LLM decompilers reach about 56% Edit Similarity and 43% BLEU-4. Tuned LLM detectors reach macro F1 of 0.61 on a realistic test set with a 3% vulnerability rate.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 24 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  46. Hey, guess what: CUES lead to inferences about typicality

    The paper builds two corpora, EventTyp and the human-validated EventTypGold, to study how people infer typicality and atypicality of events from what is said. Large-scale human and LLM experiments show that three CUES predict these inferences in humans: Commonsense Knowledge, Utterance Emphasis and Snark. In most settings LLMs lack the commonsense knowledge to judge an event's general typicality, so they struggle to follow the CUES.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 27 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  47. OWLS: Open-world Language-conditioned Speed Fields for Zero-Shot Rover Navigation

    OWLS (Open-world Language-conditioned Speed Fields) plans directly over a vision-language model's dense feature map. A text prompt describing traversable terrain scores every pixel of one camera image. The scores are projected onto the ground, adapted with two morphological operations, and used as the speed field of a minimum-time planner. It needs no training, terrain labels, map or extra sensors. It was tested on a physical rover, on simulated Mars and Moon rovers over 200 procedural terrains, and on real planetary imagery.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  48. Faster and Smaller Anonymous Credentials from Standardized Signatures

    GordieHowe is a language, certifying compiler and zero-knowledge proof system for building anonymous credentials on standardized signatures (ECDSA, RSA, ML-DSA). It proves an ECDSA-signed mobile driving license presentation in 64.8 ms with a 276 KiB proof, 10.1x faster than Google's Longfellow, and an ML-DSA-44 signature in 87.3 ms with at least 116 bits of quantum security. Compiler output and security theorems are checked in Lean. It introduces series-parallel IOPs and extends the BCS transformation in the QROM.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  49. Accordion: Elastic-Depth Inference via Fixed-Prefix Layer Looping

    Accordion is a mixture-of-experts language model (Accordion-6B-A0.5B) that supports five inference budgets through fixed-prefix layer looping, with the minimum budget being the unlooped model. After 3.6T pretraining tokens, deeper inference raises the macro-average over 37 tasks by 3.01 points, and the middle budget captures 89% of that gain with half the extra layer executions. SFT and RL keep the budgets, merging three domain experts via parameter-group merging and budget-matched multi-teacher on-policy distillation.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  50. When Agents Fail: Model or Harness--Who's to Blame?

    When Agents Fail: Model or Harness--Who's to Blame? proposes five measures for evaluating agent harnesses together with their underlying models: Valid Completion Rate, Model-Harness Fit, Cross-Model Fit, Interaction Residuals and Token Load. It tests four harnesses (OpenCode, Codex CLI, Pi CLI, DeepAgents) with four models on six benchmarks, across 111 settings and 52,168 trajectories. Harness rankings change by model and benchmark. OpenCode ranks first in cross-model performance.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  51. For Thirty Pieces of Silver: Overcoming Non-IID via ZKP Sample-Level Auditing and Forcing Attackers into Traitors in Federated Learning

    Preprint (IACR ePrint 2026/2611) proposing a federated learning defense that replaces gradient detection with zero-knowledge-proof sample-level audits of client datasets. A staking mechanism forces attackers to train on discovered poisoned samples with flipped labels, producing counter-gradients that remove the backdoor without knowing the trigger. ZKP commitments lock the training data, which blocks adaptive attacks and gradient tampering. On CIFAR-10 under Dir(0.1) non-IID, it holds attack success rate below 6% against distributed backdoor and edge-case attacks.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  52. When to Stop Penalizing Actions? Martingale GRPO for VLA Reinforcement Learning

    MART-GRPO is a variant of group-relative policy optimization for vision-language-action (VLA) reinforcement learning. It uses a LoRA-fine-tuned VLM to find the last visible error without recovery in a failed rollout video, keeps failure feedback up to that point, and drops it afterward. Martingale stopping conditions show this preserves the expected GRPO gradient and can reduce covariance. With OpenVLA-OFT on RoboTwin 2.0, it raises success rates over full-trajectory GRPO across multiple tasks.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  53. Tampered ML: Evaluating LLM Judgment of Machine Learning Research

    Tampered ML is a benchmark of 1,858 item-pairs, each pairing an experiment proposal reconstructed from a published ML paper with a minimally edited version that adds a targeted methodological flaw. Models must pick the sounder proposal in both presentation orders. A human study estimates 86% of items are valid (95% CI 81-91%). Opus 5 reaches 77.9% accuracy, and models are sensitive to order and favor flawed designs that look more specific, transparent, or conventional.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  54. Cache Engineering for Agents (AKV)

    AKV introduces cache engineering, which lets LLM agents control their active KV cache with drop (exclude cache from future attention) and repos (adjust retained keys' position encodings) without editing the trajectory or re-prefilling. The AKV serving engine keeps a stateless API while managing stateful cache reuse, eviction and restoration. A tool-response rolling-drop policy raised benchmark scores by 1.7 points and cut cost 27.7% versus threshold-triggered summarization.

    huggingface.copaperAdded 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  55. Agentic AI Defense: Decode-Time Provenance Binding for MCP

    Decode-time provenance binding is a defense for Model Context Protocol agent pipelines against cross-modal trust laundering, where instructions hidden in an email-signature image via LSB, DCT or metadata steganography get decoded by a tool. It combines HMAC-authenticated trust labels, a provenance ledger and context-taint tracking to block critical tool calls. On a real MCP testbed with 24 adaptive payloads, attack success fell from 100% undefended (62.5% for keyword and regex filters) to 0%.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  56. Balsamic: One-round Threshold UOV from GPU-Accelerated FHE

    Balsamic is a complete homomorphic Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar (UOV) signer, used to build one-round threshold UOV signatures from a packed discrete-CKKS FHE circuit. A paired-pivot linear solver and pivot-success certificates allow encrypted retry selection. In 2-out-of-3 semihonest signing, each online partial signature takes 10.7 s on an RTX 6000 Ada and 7.77 s on a GB300, with 5.25 MB per response.

    eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🛡️ Security

  57. Sensorimotor Alignment: A Platonic Proxy for Embodied Policy Success

    Sensorimotor Alignment (S^2) is a training-free offline metric that measures how well an embodied model's sensory representation aligns with the geometry of physical motion. It extends the Platonic Representation Hypothesis to motion trajectories. S^2 correlates positively with downstream robot task success across embodied model families, helps pick promising VLM backbones before fine-tuning into VLAs, and explains behaviours seen in VLAs and world action models.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  58. EpiSEM-Bench: Evaluating Safety and Evidence Recovery in LLM Agents under Missing Evidence

    EpiSEM-Bench is an executable benchmark of 300 matched unsafe/safe task pairs across six domains. It tests whether tool-using LLM agents take prohibited actions when a tool response omits a safety-relevant fact, even though the request is benign and all returned statements are true. It finds large variation across ten models, and recovery access cuts unsafe execution for all ten.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  59. BeNice! Closing Looping's Inference-Memory Gap via KV-Sharing

    BeNice! is a post-training method for looped language models that broadcasts the final recurrence's KV-cache into the first recurrence, so one cache can serve all recurrences. It follows a first stage that uses stochastic depth in pretraining to induce contractive residual dynamics. It matches standard finetuning's unshared validation perplexity and composes with multi-latent attention, Kimi delta attention and fp8, mxfp8 and nvfp4 cache quantization. In simulated low-memory long-context inference it raises cache hit rates by up to 31.4% and throughput by up to 23.6%, and cuts p90 time-to-first-token by up to 83.6%.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  60. Progress Probes $P^2$: Lightweight Runtime Monitoring for Vision-Language-Action Models

    Progress Probes (P^2) trains linear probes on a vision-language-action model's own activations, using demonstrations, to estimate task progress, then flags executions that deviate from expected progress. Tested on the open-source pi0.5 across simulated and real-world manipulation tasks, it matches or beats VLM-based monitors and failure-data-trained methods at failure detection, without an external foundation model.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🧠 AI

Showing 60 of 393

Show more