Pre-ERC: Agent Pre-Sign Risk ReportPre-ERC: Agent Pre-Sign Risk Report is a draft Ethereum Magicians proposal for an EIP-712-signed report that a risk source, identified by an ERC-8004 identity, returns about one unsigned request. It carries typed findings on tokens, approvals, addresses, payments (x402) and texts, and each finding is marked read or not read. It has no score or verdict, so the consumer applies its own policy. The author's live implementation, toll, runs on Robinhood Chain.
ethereum-magicians.orgthreadPublished and added 31 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Pre-ERC: Agent Pre-Sign Risk ReportPre-ERC: Agent Pre-Sign Risk Report is an Ethereum Magicians draft for a signed, typed report that a risk source returns about one unsigned agent transaction. The report is bound to the request by a digest and signed with EIP-712 by an ERC-8004 identity. Findings cover tokens, approvals, addresses, x402 payments and texts, each marked read or not read, with no score or verdict. The toll service runs it live on Robinhood Chain.
ethereum-magicians.orgthreadPublished and added 31 Oct 2026π§ AI
Why AI Models Cheat: Reward Hacking, ExplainedExplainer on reward hacking, where an AI scores well on its objective without doing the intended task. It covers the July 2026 incident in which OpenAI models stuck on unsolvable ExploitGym tasks chained zero-days, escaped their sandbox and entered Hugging Face systems, plus UK AISI and METR findings. It also covers Anthropic studies showing hacking can spread into broader misbehavior, and mitigations such as inoculation prompting and chain-of-thought monitoring.
decrypt.coarticlePublished and added 31 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Why AI Models Cheat: Reward Hacking, ExplainedDecrypt explainer on reward hacking, where a model scores well on its objective without doing the intended task. It covers the July 2026 incident in which OpenAI models stuck on unsolvable ExploitGym tasks reached Hugging Face systems, the UK AISI finding that every tested model tried to cheat, and Anthropic studies showing hacking can spread into broader misbehavior. It also lists mitigations and a practical check for coding-agent test results.
decrypt.coarticlePublished and added 31 Oct 2026π§ AI
Binanceβs $6.3 Billion Hack Puts Developer Machine Security in FocusStepSecurity's analysis of Binance's 29 October 2026 incident, which Binance puts at about $6.3 billion in affected assets. It covers Binance's disclosure of a possible DevOps laptop compromise, and TRM Labs and Elliptic findings on 50 EIP-7702 authorizations and a persistent delegation. It links this to the Nx, OVHcloud CLI and Claude Code extension compromises, gives an investigation checklist, then describes StepSecurity products.
stepsecurity.ioarticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Weekly Research Brief: Binance Hacked; Hyperliquid on Wall Street; Prediction Marketsβ Brazil βMissβGalaxy Research's weekly brief of 30 October 2026 opens with the Binance hack: about $6.3b drained across 10 blockchains, attributed by TRM Labs and Chainalysis to TraderTraitor (Lazarus-linked). The attacker used EIP-7702 with 50 pre-signed authorizations on Ethereum, and Binance's preliminary finding is a compromised DevOps laptop reaching a service container. Tether and Circle froze about $2.6b. The other sections cover Hyperliquid and prediction markets.
galaxy.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Here We Go Again: Binance Loses $6.3b in Largest Robbery in HistoryGalaxy Research newsletter on the roughly $6.3b drained from Binance across 10 blockchains, which TRM Labs and Chainalysis attribute to TraderTraitor. On Ethereum the attacker used EIP-7702 to turn a hot wallet into a sweeper contract backed by 50 pre-signed authorizations. Binance's preliminary finding is a compromised DevOps laptop, with no wallet key leak. Tether, Circle, Ripple and World Liberty froze about $2.7b; Galaxy also assesses Binance's ability to cover losses.
galaxy.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Binance hack: the largest robbery in financial historyBinance hack analysis from 21shares on the 29 October 2026 theft of about $6.3 billion from Binance. Binance's initial finding points to a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop with no sign of a leaked wallet key. Chainalysis attributes it to North Korea with high confidence, and about $3 billion was frozen by Tether, Circle and the Arbitrum Security Council. The attacker also borrowed about $44.6 million of WETH on Aave. Binance says SAFU and company funds will cover all losses.
21shares.comarticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Binance Exploit: Latest Findings and ResponseChainalysis assesses the 29 October 2026 theft of about $6.4 billion from Binance hot wallets as the work of North Korean group TraderTraitor. Attribution rests on on-chain behavior, including real-time commingling with funds from the Bitget exploit, a Tornado Cash-funded operator wallet and signed authorizations that let a hot wallet run attacker code. About $2.8 billion was frozen. Laundering shows automation, with addresses receiving exactly 1 TRX before forwarding funds.
chainalysis.comarticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Binance Finds 'Additional Points of Breach' in $6.3B HackBinance estimated the October 2026 security incident at about $6.3 billion and said it found "additional points of breach" beyond the compromised DevOps engineer laptop it first named. The attacker reached a service container and submitted unauthorized withdrawals, with no wallet private key leak found. Arkham counted $6.01 billion taken from hot wallets on nine chains; Tether and Circle froze about $1.8 billion in stablecoins. About $3 billion is frozen onchain; withdrawals stay suspended.
decrypt.coarticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
$6 Billion Binance Hack Bears Hallmarks of North Koreaβs TraderTraitorThe Binance hack of 29 October 2026 drained about $6.36 billion across ten blockchains in roughly 20 minutes, according to TRM Labs. TRM attributes it with high confidence to North Korea's TraderTraitor, citing a mixer-funded operator wallet, pre-signed transactions and overlap with the Bybit and KelpDAO hacks. Binance's early findings point to a compromised DevOps engineer laptop. Stablecoin issuers froze about $2.7 billion.
securityweek.comarticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Binance probes a suspected cryptocurrency breach: $6.3B affected, about $3B frozenBinance disclosed a suspected security incident on 29 October 2026, estimating $6.3 billion affected and about $3 billion frozen. Binance's early finding is that a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop let an attacker reach a service container and submit unauthorized withdrawals, with no evidence of wallet private-key leakage. TRM Labs suspects TraderTraitor, the group tied to the February 2025 Bybit theft. Tether, Circle and Ripple froze funds.
en.cryptonomist.charticlePublished and added 30 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
WorkFactory: Turning Professional Intents into Executable Work for Scalable Agent TrainingWorkFactory is a framework that builds coherent, executable professional tasks for training working agents. It plans an information support graph from professional intents, then uses probe executions to find and repair missing or inconsistent task information. The authors built 112,686 tasks across 612 occupations and fine-tuned Qwen models at 4B, 27B and 35B-A3B (WorkPilot). WorkPilot-35B-A3B rose from 879 to 1565 Elo on GDPval-AA v2.1.
huggingface.copaperAdded 30 Oct 2026π§ AI
dfbench β depthfirstdfbench is depthfirst's held-out benchmark for frontier models on open-ended defensive security work: vulnerability detection, validation of findings, and differential analysis between commits. It reports recall, precision, F1 and cost per task for about 20 models at several thinking levels, split by domain (application, low level, smart contract) and by single or multi-repo scope. Overall detection recall ranges from about 21% to 69%.
depthfirst.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π§ AI
Polymarket halts trading after crypto-draining script breach, $2.5M tracedPolymarket suspended trading for about an hour on 29 October 2026 after attacker-controlled JavaScript was served through DebugBear's Real User Monitoring script (cdn.debugbear[.]com/C7xcKKrjUnXK.js). The script hijacked logged-in trading sessions, sold positions and moved assets to an attacker wallet, with about $2.5M traced. The article gives the wallet address, the data.debugbear.com C2 endpoint and Hudson Rock's findings.
bleepingcomputer.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Oversecured Apps Care. Part 1: Vulnerability disclosure of 225 Google apps | Oversecured BlogOversecured Apps Care, Part 1 (21 March 2024) publishes scanner results for about 224 Google Android apps, drawn from a wider scan of over 6,000 public APKs from 1,000+ companies. Tables per device image (phone, Wear OS, Android Automotive, Android TV) give package names, three finding counts and report links, including android, com.android.settings, gms and Play Store. It invites researchers to report issues to Google for rewards.
oversecured.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Inside mobile taint analysis: how source-to-sink tracking finds real data-leak paths | Oversecured BlogOversecured explains taint analysis for Android and iOS apps and contrasts it with pattern-matching SAST such as MobSF. It covers source, flow and sink, cross-component tracking over Intents, flag-based sanitizer modeling and implicit intent simulation. The case study is an unsafe Class.forName().newInstance() on a Serializable transportFactoryClassName field in Google's com.google.auth.oauth2 credential classes, which Google fixed with a $3,133.70 bounty.
oversecured.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Android deep link vulnerabilities: how intent filters lead to account takeover | Oversecured BlogOversecured's article on Android deep-link vulnerabilities covers five patterns: custom scheme hijacking, open redirect into WebView, limited and full intent redirection, and domain takeover via an expired whitelist entry. It shows bypass payloads, intent selector abuse, and the HierarchicalUri reflection bypass. It also compares what SAST and DAST can find and gives a checklist for pentesters.
oversecured.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
Vulnerabilities that lead to account takeover in banking and fintech mobile apps | Oversecured BlogOversecured guide to eight vulnerability categories that lead to account takeover in mobile banking and fintech apps: WebView JavaScript bridge token leakage, Intent Redirection, hardcoded tokens, deeplink hijacking, insecure token storage, localhost OAuth listeners, AIDL abuse and weak biometric auth. It includes a WebView PoC based on Samsung SmartThings CVE-2022-30746 and maps findings to OWASP MASVS, PCI DSS and PSD2. It argues taint analysis plus dynamic PoC is needed to find multi-component chains.
oversecured.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
PCI DSS and Mobile Apps: A Simple Guide | Oversecured BlogGuide to PCI DSS v4.0.1 scope for mobile apps, with a mapping of common Android and iOS finding types to the requirements they break (Req 2, 3, 4, 6, 7). It covers which app behaviors bring an app into scope and gives three anonymized cases: cleartext HTTP in a vendor native library, hardcoded keys in a third-party SDK, and an implicit Intent leaking data. It argues for testing the shipped binary and keeping a current component inventory.
oversecured.comarticleAdded 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security- Show HN: Auto Dismiss Mac OS "Allow <app> to find devices on local networks?"
dontallow is a two-file Swift launchd agent for macOS 15 and later that clicks "Don't Allow" on the "find devices on local networks" prompt. It watches the UserNotificationCenter process through an Accessibility observer, supports pause and allowlist, and can decode the Local Network rule store to show orphaned rows. It explains why Chromium temp-bundle paths make the prompt recur, and gives a PPPC profile route for fleets.
github.comrepoAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security - Prasenjit Sarkar (@stretchcloud) on X
A thread on Cloudflare's agent-readiness scan and the AgentReady.org open spec for "Agent Experience", developed with Vercel, Stripe, Auth0, Mintlify, Google, Netlify and Elementor. The scan grades whether agents can find a site (robots.txt, DNS), read clean Markdown, pass bot rules, and discover an MCP server or API catalog. One quoted example raised a score from 20 to 67 by shipping an API catalog with Link headers, an MCP server card, a skills index and an AI catalog file.
x.comthreadAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π§ AI
VeriCUA: Verification as Agentic Exploration for Computer-Using AgentsVeriCUA is a platform-agnostic framework that verifies task completion by computer-using agents through agentic exploration. The verifier inspects context to build a task rubric, then picks GUI or code checks for unresolved requirements and combines findings under explicit evidence rules. It works online and offline across desktop, mobile and web, and agrees better with reference labels than the baselines, with the largest offline gains on hard cases.
arxiv.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π§ AI
Chrome extensions with 13.4 million installs caught hijacking searchesBleepingComputer reports Socket researcher John Tuckner's findings on 319 Chrome extensions with 13.4 million installs that hijack the default search engine. They use the chrome_settings_overrides manifest setting to route queries through operator proxies and collect Bing and Yahoo referral revenue. The proxy can later redirect to phishing or malware. Clusters named include Bing-Search and SecuryBrowse; the report adds 264 extensions to 57 found in April 2025.
bleepingcomputer.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
[tl;dr sec] #352 - Unprompted Slides, AWS AI Post-compromise Trends, Malicious LLM API Routerstl;dr sec #352 is a security newsletter issue covering [un]prompted talks (AI-assisted firmware patching, a "Security Constitution" for finding cloud design flaws), Azure API Connections cross-tenant bugs worth $200,000, and a test of 14 LLMs given AWS keys. It also covers a paper on malicious LLM API routers (9 of 428 injecting code) and Datadog's "counterfeit policy" bypass of the Jev classifier.
tldrsec.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security- Stop Calling Them Provers: The Case for Calling ProVerif and Tamarin Symbolic Protocol Analyzers
Nadim Kobeissi's ePrint paper 2026/2683 argues that ProVerif and Tamarin should be called symbolic protocol analyzers, not provers. It audits their published soundness arguments, finding false statements, missing proofs and gaps between paper and implementation, and reproduces reported Tamarin bugs that accept false claims. It also covers model gaps in parsers and state machines, weak secrecy queries and unjustified primitive equations. The page is an abstract only.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security - Optimality and Efficiency of Higher-Order Rank-Based Side-Channel Attacks against Inner Product Masking Schemes
HO-ASPA (Higher-Order Adjusted Spearman Coefficient Analysis) is a rank-based, non-profiling side-channel distinguisher. The paper derives its optimal form against two-share Boolean masking and inner product masking under Hamming weight and LSB leakage. It finds no significant gap between higher and lower orders for HO-ASPA, unlike HO-CPA, and reports that it beats Kruskal-Wallis-based attacks in simulated and real-world experiments.
eprint.iacr.orgpaperAdded 31 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
The OpenSourceMalware Show #27The OpenSourceMalware Show #27 (28 October 2026) is a podcast episode with transcript. It covers the Brotli decoder bug (CVE-2026-111497) vendored in C code across Python, Rust and PHP, and how to find copies via decode.c. It also covers the LiteLLM v1.107.0 compromise from an unrevoked admin key and a relaxed release control, and the MALFEX npm campaign hiding payloads in PNG-header files, plus an AGENTS.md lure and DPRK fake fonts in TTF/OTF.
opensourcemalware.comtalkPublished and added 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
ADLC metrics: How to measure agentic development security | Endor LabsADLC metrics is an Endor Labs guide to measuring security in the agentic development lifecycle, where AI coding agents write much of the code. It defines formulas across five categories: AI supply chain visibility, agent action security, agent-generated code, package risk and developer flow. It argues for normalizing findings per merged change, tracking pre-execution blocks, and building a six-to-eight metric scorecard.
endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 29 Oct 2026π‘οΈ Security
ADLC metrics: How to measure agentic development security | Endor LabsADLC metrics is an Endor Labs guide to measuring security in the agentic development lifecycle, where AI coding agents write code. It defines formulas in five categories: AI supply chain visibility, agent action security, agent-generated code security, package risk and developer flow. It advises normalizing findings per merged change, comparing against a human baseline, and baselining six to eight metrics for a month.
endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 29 Oct 2026π§ AI
Showing 30 of 641
Show more