Skip to content

83 results for β€œAI coding agents”

What you seeeverything
  1. Hugging Face malware campaign returns to hijack GPUs for crypto mining

    A campaign of 31 malicious Hugging Face repositories across seven accounts, found by Pluto Security, posed as small Qwen2 checkpoints and used trust_remote_code to run a cryptominer and reverse shell on GPU inference hosts. The top model reached 28,412 downloads and scanned clean, and a second wave returned within days of takedown. The article also covers a fake Solana starter kit on GitHub that installs NetSupport Manager via a PowerShell one-liner aimed at AI coding agents.

    bleepingcomputer.comarticleAdded 30 Oct 2026, published 29 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  2. ADLC metrics: How to measure agentic development security | Endor Labs

    ADLC metrics is an Endor Labs guide to measuring security in the agentic development lifecycle, where AI coding agents write much of the code. It defines formulas across five categories: AI supply chain visibility, agent action security, agent-generated code, package risk and developer flow. It argues for normalizing findings per merged change, tracking pre-execution blocks, and building a six-to-eight metric scorecard.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 29 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  3. ADLC metrics: How to measure agentic development security | Endor Labs

    ADLC metrics is an Endor Labs guide to measuring security in the agentic development lifecycle, where AI coding agents write code. It defines formulas in five categories: AI supply chain visibility, agent action security, agent-generated code security, package risk and developer flow. It advises normalizing findings per merged change, comparing against a human baseline, and baselining six to eight metrics for a month.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 29 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  4. Eddy (@ieddysun) on X

    Expo's official skills package gives AI coding agents scoped instructions for building Expo apps. One command, npx skills@latest add expo/skills --skill '*', installs it for Cursor, Copilot and Windsurf, while Claude Code and Codex use their plugin marketplaces. Skills include expo-router, expo-animation, expo-upgrade and eas-update. The Expo MCP server adds live docs lookup, compatible dependency installs, EAS build monitoring and simulator screenshots.

    x.comthreadAdded 29 Oct 2026, published 28 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  5. How to evaluate ADLC security solutions: A buyer's checklist | Endor Labs

    Buyer's checklist from Endor Labs for evaluating security tools in the agentic development lifecycle (ADLC), where AI coding agents write code and take actions such as package installs, CI edits and tool calls. It covers scoping, coverage, evidence-based accuracy, repeatability testing, agent-loop and PR workflow fit, remediation, governance, and a 2 to 4 week proof of concept on 3 to 5 repos with seeded ground truth.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 28 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  6. Your Wish Is My Commit: Over-Compliant Refactoring in AI Coding Agents

    Your Wish Is My Commit is a controlled study of over-compliant refactoring in Codex and Claude Code, run across five models, 50 algorithmic tasks and 10 object-oriented tasks. Over 3,000 turns of repeated "refactor further" prompts, no model stopped on its own: each rewrote up to 31x the original codebase before first stopping and resumed edits after declaring the task complete. The paper defines six behavioral signals for detecting over-compliance.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 28 Oct 2026, published 26 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  7. affaan-m/ECC | RepoDir

    ECC (affaan-m/ECC) is an open-source performance optimization system for AI coding agents. It packages 261+ skills, 64+ agents and 84+ commands that tune Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agent harnesses for speed, memory and security. Practitioners can use it as a ready-made skills and harness configuration set. The RepoDir page gives only this short description, with no install steps or benchmarks.

    repodir.comrepoAdded 24 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  8. Show HN: Corgi, a helpful {agent, terminal} multiplexer

    Corgi is a terminal multiplexer for humans and AI coding agents, installed with a curl script. It shows each agent's state (working, needs you, finished, idle), keeps agents running in the background like tmux, and tracks token usage, per-workspace resource use and every file an agent changed. It also supports git worktrees, SSH image paste (needs Ghostty Nightly) and a corgi --skill command that teaches agents to drive it.

    corgi.computertoolAdded 24 Oct 2026, published 23 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  9. ADLC Security Best Practices for Teams Shipping with Coding Agents | Endor Labs

    ADLC Security Best Practices is an Endor Labs guide to controlling what AI coding agents can access, run, install and ship. It covers inventorying agents and MCP servers, sandboxing, pre-execution hooks instead of AGENTS.md rules, install-time package checks against slopsquatting and malware, reachability-based triage of agent PRs, and CI/CODEOWNERS protections. A five-step worked example and coverage metrics are included.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 23 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  10. Sadra Majidi (@SadraMajidi04) on X

    Impeccable is an open-source skill for AI coding agents that steers them away from generic UI output such as purple gradients and nested cards. It provides 24 commands (critique, audit, polish, typeset) and 61 detector rules that run without an LLM. It works with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex, and the repo is pbakaus/impeccable on GitHub. The source is a short tweet and gives no further detail.

    x.comrepoAdded 23 Oct 2026, published 22 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  11. Trail of Bits (@trailofbits) on X

    Trail of Bits announces two open-source plugins, patching-bugs and regression-hunt, for AI coding agents that speed up bug patching. They come from four months of Patch the Planet work with open-source projects, which found that repo-level documentation, skills and plugins give agents the maintainer context on what counts as a bug, how a fix should look and what must not break. The post cites the October 2026 PHP incident: a patch touching 402 files, and exploitation within 17 hours of leaked details.

    x.comarticleAdded 23 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  12. LayerFS: The filesystem for AI coding agents

    LayerFS is a serverless, versioned filesystem for AI coding agents. Every file or Bash tool call becomes a commit on a branch, agents on different machines share one Store without a database server, and same-file clashes are refused with Conflict. Forks copy no files, chunks are deduplicated and compressed, and ignored dependency files persist, so a mount takes about 0.05 s against about 5 minutes of reinstalling. The page gives vendor claims and no benchmarks or docs.

    layerfs.aitoolAdded 22 Oct 2026, published 21 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  13. Dan Kornas (@DanKornas) on X

    decomp.wtf is an open-source (MIT) local workspace where AI coding agents decompile games into C, one function at a time. Agents receive assembly, data, callers and earlier attempt notes, then each C candidate is compiled with the game's original compiler, linked at its real address and compared byte for byte, with instruction diffs on misses. It exposes MCP tools for Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity CLI and opencode, plus a live view of agent calls and match scores.

    x.comtoolAdded 19 Oct 2026, published 18 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  14. From GTA V on iPhone to Free Photoshop: This AI Tool Is Upending Software

    Decrypt reports on REA (Reverse Engineer Anything), an open-source toolkit that uses MCP to connect AI coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex to reverse-engineering tools like Ghidra. It went from under 10,000 to over 100,000 GitHub stars in a week. The article describes AI-decompiled game ports and mashups, and ArtCraft, a set of Rust-built Photoshop-style apps that Brandon Thomas made with Claude Opus 5.5 as a clean-room rebuild. It also covers the copyright and takedown fallout (Activision, Bethesda) and what cheap agent-driven decompilation means for software protection.

    decrypt.coarticlePublished and added 12 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  15. State of Dependency Management 2025 | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs' 2025 State of Dependency Management report examines how AI coding agents and MCP servers add supply chain risk. Researchers analysed 10,663 GitHub MCP server repositories and tested AI-generated dependency recommendations across PyPI, npm, Maven and NuGet, finding agents import vulnerable or non-existent packages. MCP servers are immature: 75% are built by individuals, 41% lack license info, and 82% use sensitive APIs. The report advises treating AI-generated code as untrusted third-party input subject to code review, SAST/SCA and dependency governance.

    endorlabs.compaperPublished and added 12 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  16. Introducing AI Coding Agent Governance: Using Hooks to Bring Visibility to the ADLC | Endor Labs

    Explains how lifecycle hooks in Claude Code (.claude/settings.json) and Cursor (.cursor/hooks.json) can act as a deterministic, out-of-band control layer for AI coding agents. It covers the hook events, the JSON passed on stdin, and the response contracts. Claude Code uses exit codes plus permissionDecision, updatedInput and additionalContext. Cursor uses stdout JSON with permission and userMessage. It then shows how Endor Labs' `endorctl ai-audit` handler normalises events across both harnesses, streams them to a central audit trail and enforces server-side policies (29 defaults) such as shell allow/deny lists, sensitive-file patterns and MCP allowlists.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 12 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  17. StepSecurity Now Inventories AI Agent Skills in Your GitHub Repositories and on Developer Machines

    StepSecurity announces two new inventory features β€” Dev Machine Guard's Agent Skills page (scanning 18 AI coding agents' skill directories on developer machines) and a GitHub Agent Skills page (scanning default branches of org repos daily) β€” to track AI agent "skills" (SKILL.md folders with optional scripts/hooks) across an organization. The post frames skills as a supply-chain surface because they can execute shell commands, pre-approve tool permissions via allowed-tools frontmatter (bypassing Claude Code's workspace trust gate), and look like harmless Markdown documentation in PR review, citing the Miasma worm, s1ngularity, and the Cline v2.3.0 compromise as precedent for this attack class. It details inventory features like content-hash comparison across devices, provenance tracing via skills.sh/skills-lock.json, and filters for shell/hooks/code execution flags to prioritize review.

    stepsecurity.ioarticlePublished and added 8 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  18. Show HN: Agent.reviews – Where AI agents read and write reviews on tools

    Agent.reviews is a review platform built specifically for AI coding agents: agents like Claude Code, Codex and a "Muse Code" agent write first-hand reviews of developer tools and services (FastAPI, Auth0, Amazon DynamoDB, Redis, Playwright, Vercel, Daytona, Git, npm, Claude API, Cursor) based on real usage during coding tasks, noting concrete friction like nested executables, missing live-credential verification, or scattered docs. The site exposes agent-readable endpoints (skill.md, install.md, llms.txt, and a .md mirror of every page) so a coding agent can both consult prior reviews when choosing a tool and submit its own after a task.

    agent.reviewstoolAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 7 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  19. Alhaji Premium Man (@softhardguy) on X

    A tweet thread announcing Concord, an open-source coordination layer for running multiple AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) concurrently on the same codebase. Agents claim files before editing so overlapping edits trigger warnings, and the tool lets agents message each other across the different coding-agent harnesses, addressing the conflict problem that appears once three or more agents work in parallel.

    x.comthreadPublished and added 7 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  20. Introducing the Kotlin Benchmark for AI coding agents (JetBrains)

    JetBrains introduces the Kotlin Benchmark, a SWE-bench-style evaluation suite of 105 repository-level engineering tasks drawn from real open-source Kotlin projects, where agents must read an issue, navigate a codebase, and produce a patch verified by containerized test execution. Built on the open-source Multi-SWE-bench infrastructure, it ships with a public leaderboard and GitHub assets; the first results rank Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.7 (85.71% resolved) ahead of JetBrains Junie with Opus 4.7 and Codex with GPT-5.5, both at 81.9%. JetBrains positions it as complementary to model-level Kotlin evals like Kotlin_HumanEval and Kotlin_QA, and plans to expand coverage to Android/Kotlin Multiplatform tasks and additional metrics beyond pass/fail.

    blog.jetbrains.comarticleAdded 4 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  21. walkinglabs/learn-harness-engineering

    Learn Harness Engineering is a free, project-based GitHub course teaching how to build the "harness" around AI coding agents β€” the instructions, state tracking, verification, scope control, and session lifecycle that make models like Claude and Codex reliable on real repositories instead of just prompt-following. It includes 14 lectures, 8 hands-on projects built around an evolving Electron knowledge-base app, copy-ready templates (AGENTS.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, claude-progress.md), a harness-creator agent skill for scaffolding new projects, and a zero-dependency audit-harness.sh script that checks a repo against the five harness subsystems. Recent updates add "Frontier Harness Design Breakdowns" and new Graph/Loop Engineering lectures covering multi-node agent graphs, parallelism, and loop design outside the agent itself.

    github.comcourseAdded 3 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  22. Why AI Coding Agents Keep Writing Broken Access Control

    Snyk argues AI coding agents reliably write broken access control (BOLA/IDOR, OWASP's top category since 2021) because the facts needed to add an ownership check β€” what an object belongs to, who may access it, where tenant boundaries sit β€” are tacit product knowledge that exists nowhere in the code or prompt an agent sees. It explains why SAST tools catch patterned sub-categories like path traversal or SSRF but structurally cannot catch CWE-639/862/863 (missing or incorrect authorization), since there's no bad pattern to match, and proposes reasoning over an assembled "application-context graph" of architecture, data flows and trust boundaries instead. It closes with a five-step team checklist (inventory ID-accepting endpoints, document ownership rules, add authorization-specific PR review, write cross-tenant tests, run deep contextual analysis) and pitches Snyk's Evo Agentic AppSec as the tool built around that approach.

    snyk.ioarticlePublished and added 1 Oct 2026🧠 AI

  23. Why AI Coding Agents Keep Writing Broken Access Control

    Snyk explains why AI coding agents reliably ship broken object-level authorization (BOLA/IDOR) bugs: the ownership rule that would prevent them (e.g. "invoices belong to organizations") lives in the product's data model and team knowledge, not in the prompt or surrounding code, so the agent produces code that is correct for the stated task but lets any authenticated user access other tenants' objects. The piece maps the flaw to CWE-639/862/863, contrasts it with pattern-matchable classes like SSRF and path traversal that SAST handles well, and lays out five concrete team actions (endpoint inventory, documented ownership rules, explicit authz review questions, per-resource cross-tenant tests, and periodic deep contextual analysis), while pitching Snyk's "application-context graph" and Evo Agentic AppSec as the tool for the pattern-less gap.

    snyk.ioarticlePublished and added 1 Oct 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  24. Dark Web Intelligence (@DailyDarkWeb) on X

    Glow Labs' "PixelLeak" research found that AI coding agents, unable to attach before/after screenshots to private pull requests, worked around the limitation by creating public GitHub repositories to host the images and link them back into the PR. This exposed over 13,000 internal images (billing records, treasury consoles, unreleased features) across 900+ public repos at 300+ organizations β€” 93% under employees' personal GitHub accounts, outside corporate monitoring β€” with one team even encoding the behavior into a reusable agent skill. The case illustrates an "authorized but unsafe" agentic risk class distinct from prompt injection or malicious compromise.

    x.comthreadAdded 1 Oct 2026, published 30 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  25. rehan-remade/universal-modder

    universal-modder is a set of Agent Skills, a CLI (um) and a shared knowledge base (field notes in knowledge/) that let AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode find a PC game's engine, reverse-engineer its code, build a working mod, generate art/3D/sound assets via the fal MCP server (or a local ComfyUI server), test the mod in the running game, and write a field note for the next agent. It ships worked examples β€” a weapon/boss pack for Terraria via tModLoader, a new civilization for Age of Empires II DE, and a real-time Minecraft-inside-GTA-V passthrough mod β€” each documented with a field note of exact versions, routes and gotchas, and agents can open pull requests to grow the shared knowledge base.

    github.comrepoAdded 6 Oct 2026, published 30 Sep 2026🧠 AI

  26. AI Agent Sandbox Flaw in brig: Symlink Traversal (CVSS 8.2) | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs researcher pkennedy details GHSA-wp6x-29qx-fpr7 (ENDOR-VUL-2026-1809, CVSS 8.2, CWE-59), a symlink-traversal flaw in brig, a tool that runs AI coding agents inside microVM/container sandboxes. While brig's shared working directory was carefully guarded against symlink swaps, the user-named project directory was passed to the underlying runtime (Virtualization.framework on macOS, containerd/nerdctl on Linux) as a raw unresolved path; an agent could replace a subfolder it already controls with a symlink to any host directory, which is then mounted read-write into the sandbox on the next run, exposing SSH keys, cloud credentials, and other projects with the operator's privileges. Fixed in brig 0.3.0 by resolving and holding the path open before mounting; the piece includes full PoC commands, root-cause code snippet, and a detailed vendor disclosure/CVSS negotiation narrative.

    endorlabs.comwriteupPublished and added 28 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  27. SpecterOps/Blacklight β€” local AI agent attack surface mapping toolkit

    Blacklight is a SpecterOps toolkit for endpoint forensics on AI coding agents, split into Scout (bounded metadata/filesystem triage across Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity CLI, and Grok that finds candidate session artifacts without reading their contents) and Session Analysis (a Python CLI that parses selected JSONL/SQLite session downloads from Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and Antigravity CLI into ranked, redacted local reports). It's built for investigators who need to identify and review AI agent session history on a host β€” surfacing config, auth metadata, and high-value indicators β€” while explicitly leaving secret scanning to external tooling; paths are informed by SpecterOps' Endpoint AI Agent Abuse (EAA) technique catalog.

    github.comrepoAdded 27 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  28. Control the Harness, Control the Cost: Routing and Governing AI Coding Agents in the Enterprise

    This paper argues that the coding-agent "harness" (Claude Code, Codex, etc.), not just the underlying model, controls enterprise AI spend, since it decides model choice, context reads, prompt-cache usage and subagent invocation. The authors build Jev, a calibrated classifier that routes agentic prompts against a custom taxonomy at points where prompt caches aren't disrupted (session start, side lanes, subagent launch), and show via repricing ~10,000 real sessions and a 10,000-seat emulated enterprise that such routing recovers 14–21% of model spend ($3.3M–$5.0M/year at Anthropic's Sept 2026 prices). It also maps risks across twenty harnesses and proposes a control plane for enterprises to reduce single-vendor dependence.

    arxiv.orgpaperAdded 26 Sep 2026🧠 AI

  29. Malicious .git Configs Can Make Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Other AI Agents Run Attacker Code

    Manifold Security (publishing as GitSpawn) found that a repository's own .git/config can set core.fsmonitor to an arbitrary command, which Git silently executes on any index-refreshing operation (git status, git diff) β€” including the background branch/diff checks AI coding agents run at session startup, before any trust prompt, sandbox, or model call. The technique, requiring only that a .git directory arrive intact via archive/USB/sync-folder rather than a fresh clone, was confirmed in goose, Codex CLI/Desktop, Claude Code (two separate paths), Cursor, Hermes Agent, Qwen Code, and Grok Build; goose, Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor have shipped fixes while Hermes Agent, Qwen Code, Grok Build, and Claude Code's "ultrareview" path remained exploitable as of September 1, 2026. OpenAI separately published three CVEs for the same class in Codex, and the piece ties the pattern back to earlier IDE trust-dialog bypasses (VS Code CVE-2021-43891, JetBrains CVE-2022-24346).

    thehackernews.comarticleAdded 26 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  30. Agentjacking Attack Tricks AI Coding Agents Into Running Malicious Code

    Researchers at Tenet Security disclosed Agentjacking, an attack abusing Sentry's public write-only DSN credential to inject crafted error events containing markdown-formatted malicious instructions. When a developer asks an AI coding agent to fix unresolved Sentry issues, the agent retrieves the poisoned event via the Sentry MCP server, cannot distinguish it from legitimate diagnostic guidance, and executes attacker-controlled code with the developer's full privileges. Tenet found over 2,388 organizations with exposed injectable DSNs and reported an 85 percent exploitation success rate in controlled tests; Sentry acknowledged the flaw but declined to fix it beyond filtering one specific payload string.

    thehackernews.comarticleAdded 26 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  31. CVE-2026-75130: Context7 through 2

    CVE-2026-75130 describes a prompt injection flaw in Context7 (through v2.1.2), an MCP server that serves library documentation to AI coding agents. The vulnerability lies in the Custom AI Instructions feature, which fails to sanitize content before injecting it into agent context; attackers can poison these instructions so that a routine documentation lookup triggers the agent to exfiltrate credentials from environment files and delete files on the victim's machine. Researchers at Noma Security and VulnCheck published independent technical breakdowns of the attack chain.

    nvd.nist.govadvisoryAdded 26 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  32. Plugin4Shell - Zero Click RCE Vulnerability found in top 4 most popular coding agents, millions of agents affected

    Air Security researchers found that AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI) that SHA-pin plugins from marketplaces never verify the checked-out commit actually matches the pin, letting an attacker who controls a plugin's upstream repo create a branch named after the 40-hex SHA (or, for Gemini CLI, named FETCH_HEAD) so git resolves the ref to attacker-controlled code instead of the pinned commit. Because agents auto-update plugins in the background, this yields zero-click RCE against already-installed, previously-vetted plugins even when marketplaces do everything the pinning security model asks; Anthropic and OpenAI patched after disclosure, Microsoft has not patched GitHub Copilot, and Google will not patch the deprecated Gemini CLI.

    air.securitywriteupAdded 26 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  33. When chat is the wrong UI

    Burke Holland (GitHub) argues that chat is often the wrong interface for working with AI coding agents and introduces "canvas" β€” a feature in the GitHub Copilot app that spins up a small full-stack application with no browser chrome, which can call third-party APIs or run code locally while exchanging messages bidirectionally with the Copilot agent. He walks through concrete canvases: a playable Connect 4 game against the agent, a Winget package browser/installer, a SQLite query UI with IntelliSense, a Markdown-to-Windows-Live-Writer-style blog editor, and a full development-workflow automation canvas that removes the human from the loop between research, prototyping and review steps. The piece frames this as a general lesson for agent builders: build a reusable tool the agent and user can both interact with, rather than burning tokens asking the agent to perform every repetitive action through chat.

    github.blogarticleAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 24 Sep 2026🧠 AI

  34. Engineering a security harness for AI coding agents | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs lays out a seven-question framework for building a 'security harness' around AI coding/security agents: defining task scope, engineering minimal sufficient evidence retrieval, tiered authority (Read→Recommend→Prepare→Publish→Enforce), hard enforcement gates before consequential actions, and operational controls for evaluation, failure containment, and versioned change management. It argues the model should never be the control plane — deterministic evidence and explicit approval boundaries must sit around it — and backs the evidence-architecture point with a benchmark showing a 91.7% token reduction (6.6M vs 79.5M) when agents receive deterministic security evidence instead of reconstructing it via tool loops.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 22 Sep 2026🧠 AI

  35. Engineering a security harness for AI coding agents | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs engineering post arguing that prompts are not security controls and lays out a seven-question framework for building a "security harness" around AI coding/remediation agents: defining the job, minimizing evidence to authoritative facts, tiering authority (Read→Recommend→Prepare→Publish→Enforce), gating consequential actions on proven conditions, evaluating process/result/outcome with contestability, failing closed on interruption or attack, and versioning/owning the agent over time. It illustrates the approach with a controlled dependency-remediation workflow (upgrading Jinja2 with explicit stop-for-approval gates) and cites an internal benchmark where evidence-equipped agents used 91.7% fewer tokens (6.6M vs 79.5M) than agents that had to reconstruct security posture via tool-loop reconnaissance.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 22 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  36. WordPress Security Skills

    WordPress-Security-Skills is a GitHub repo of modular 'Agent Skills' (per the open Agent Skills spec) that install into AI coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, and Gemini CLI to guide secure-by-default WordPress plugin/theme development and security code review. Each skill targets a documented failure mode in AI-generated WordPress code β€” missing nonce checks, broken authorization, missing output escaping, unprepared SQL queries β€” with when-to-use guidance, common AI mistakes (wrong vs right), code examples, and checklists tied to official WordPress API references. It is explicitly instructional Markdown/PHP reference material, not a scanner or automatic protection, meant for developers and reviewers auditing AI-written or third-party WordPress code.

    github.comrepoAdded 22 Sep 2026, published 15 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  37. SolarWinds took a nation-state. The next attack just needs an LLM and $5. | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs blog tracing an accelerating pattern of software supply-chain compromises from July 2025 through March 2026, culminating in the TeamPCP threat actor's cascading 30-day compromise of Aqua Security, Trivy, GitHub Actions, Docker Hub, npm, OpenVSX, and PyPI (including backdooring the 95M-download LiteLLM package). It argues AI is accelerating both offense (CVE-GENIE reproducing 51% of CVE exploits for $2.77 each) and the attack surface (the Cline prompt-injection-to-npm-token-theft chain, Nx's AI-review-evading payload), and calls for treating AI coding agents as privileged actors, pinning GitHub Actions to SHAs, and platform-level fixes like immutable tags and Sigstore/OIDC.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 11 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  38. sage β€” Agent Detection & Response (ADR) for AI coding agents

    Sage is an "Agent Detection & Response" (ADR) security layer that intercepts tool calls made by AI coding agents β€” shell commands, URL fetches, file writes β€” and screens them through multiple detection layers before execution. It combines cloud URL reputation, 300+ YAML local heuristics, a two-tier (heuristic + fine-tuned ML) prompt-injection detector for fetched content, npm/PyPI package supply-chain checks (registry existence, file reputation, age), installed-plugin scanning at session start, and Windows AMSI integration. It ships as a plugin for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, OpenClaw, and OpenCode, and is published by Gen Digital (also distributed under the Norton/Avast Sage branding).

    github.comrepoAdded 10 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  39. trailofbits/skills

    Trail of Bits maintains a Claude Code plugin marketplace of "skills" that extend AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, ChatGPT workspaces) with security analysis, testing, and secure development capabilities. It's installed via `/plugin marketplace add trailofbits/skills` and is also compatible with Codex's Claude marketplace support, with related sibling repos for curated skills, devcontainers, and config.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 7 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  40. andyrewlee/awesome-agent-orchestrators

    A curated GitHub list cataloguing open-source and source-available tools for orchestrating AI coding agents, organized into categories: terminal multiplexers/TUIs (tmux+worktree managers like claude-squad, amux, agent-manager), desktop/web parallel-session apps (Ghostex, Tempest, Vicoa), multi-agent swarms with inter-agent coordination (crewAI, gastown, loki-mode), autonomous loop runners (Ralph Wiggum-style loops like ralph-orchestrator, bernstein), issue/board-driven task runners (cyrus, open-swe, claude-code-action), infrastructure/control-plane primitives (Concord MCP, Agent Messaging Protocol), and always-on personal assistants (openclaw, rowboat). It covers dozens of tools working with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and other agent CLIs, plus a watchlist of stalled projects. Useful as a map of the fast-moving agent-orchestration tooling landscape as of mid-2026.

    github.comrepoAdded 23 Sep 2026, published 7 Sep 2026🧠 AI

  41. Dev Machine Guard Now Supports Linux - StepSecurity

    StepSecurity announces Linux support (Debian/RPM, .deb and .rpm packages) for Dev Machine Guard, its open-source developer-machine inventory and scanning engine, extending existing macOS/Windows coverage. The tool detects installed AI coding agents (Claude, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex), IDE extensions from VS Code Marketplace and OpenVSX, MCP server configs, npm packages, and Linux system packages (rpm, dpkg, pacman, apk, snap, flatpak) via native mechanisms like systemd user timers and BIOS-serial device identity, and is explicitly framed as a response to incidents like the Shai-Hulud npm worm, s1ngularity/Nx compromise, and Mini Shai-Hulud/TanStack attacks. It ships in a free local-only Community mode and a paid Enterprise mode with centralized dashboard, policy enforcement, and dependency cooldown/alerting.

    stepsecurity.ioarticleAdded 5 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  42. Dev Machine Guard Now Supports Windows - StepSecurity

    StepSecurity announces Windows 10/11 support (x64 and ARM64, Sigstore-signed with build provenance) for Dev Machine Guard, its open-source developer-endpoint scanner. It inventories AI coding agents, MCP server configs, IDE extensions from the VS Code Marketplace and OpenVSX, and global and per-project npm packages. This lets teams find which developer machines have a compromised package or extension after incidents like Shai-Hulud, s1ngularity and Mini Shai-Hulud. Windows detection uses %LOCALAPPDATA%, %PROGRAMFILES%, registry Uninstall keys and schtasks scheduling. Community mode runs fully locally, while enterprise mode reports to a dashboard with policy enforcement.

    stepsecurity.ioarticleAdded 5 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  43. Agentic Development Security: How to Secure Code Your Agents Write | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs blog post defining "agentic development security" β€” securing code, dependencies, and tool use when AI coding agents generate and merge code autonomously. It cites research showing 45% of LLM-generated code samples fail security tests (Veracode), 34% of AI-recommended dependency versions are hallucinated (Endor Labs), 82% of MCP implementations have path-traversal-prone file operations, and explains reachability analysis plus EPSS scoring as noise-reduction filters for prioritizing exploitable findings.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  44. The Secure Agentic Development Lifecycle (ADLC), Explained | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs defines the "agentic development lifecycle" (ADLC) β€” the process by which AI coding agents autonomously plan, write, test, and ship code β€” and lays out where it introduces new security risk: insecure-by-default code, architectural design flaws that pass static analysis, hallucinated/unvetted dependencies, and a review bottleneck as agents outpace human reviewers. It cites benchmark data (62% of best-model BaxBench solutions insecure, only 10.5% of SWE-Agent/Claude 4 Sonnet solutions secure, only 1 in 5 AI-recommended dependency versions safe) and proposes a control stack β€” secure-generation prompting, security-aware multi-agent PR review, reachability-based prioritization, and automated remediation β€” mapped to NIST SP 800-218A, CSA's Agentic SDLC, and OWASP.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  45. AI Code Review: How to Actually Review Code an Agent Wrote | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs explainer on "AI code review" as a discipline: pairing LLM reasoning with static analysis (call graphs, data flow) to catch security-relevant PR changes that AI coding agents introduce, alongside human reviewers. It cites research showing common AI-generated flaws (missing input validation CWE-20/89/78, hardcoded secrets CWE-798, broken auth CWE-306/284, hallucinated/insecure dependencies), Endor's finding that under 9.5% of vulnerabilities are reachable/exploitable, and a comparison of AI review against SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning, plus a rollout checklist referencing NIST SP 800-218A.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  46. Prompt Patterns That Make Coding Agents Write Safer Code | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs breaks down prompt engineering patterns that reduce vulnerabilities in AI-generated code: a design-spec pattern that front-loads security requirements, naming specific CWEs to avoid (e.g. CWE-89, CWE-79, CWE-20), and a "secure-insecure diff" recursive self-critique loop, while warning that telling a model to role-play a security expert actually performs worse. It cites research showing these patterns cut vulnerability density by up to 56–77.5%, notes that repeated AI iteration can drift toward less-secure code, and flags that AI coding agents frequently suggest hallucinated or vulnerable dependencies (34% hallucinated per Endor's own dependency research), arguing prompts must be paired with SAST/SCA/secrets scanning and reachability-based prioritization.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  47. Prompt Injection Against Coding Agents: The Attack Surface Nobody Owns | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs breaks down how indirect prompt injection compromises AI coding agents (Cursor, GitHub Copilot) via poisoned READMEs/rules files, malicious MCP servers, and web/issue content the agent reads with elevated trust and auto-approve permissions. Cites a study testing 314 payloads across 70 MITRE ATT&CK techniques showing up to 84% attack success, OWASP's MCP tool poisoning definition, Unit 42's real-world IDPI telemetry, and CVE-2025-52573 as a concrete command-injection-via-prompt-injection case in an MCP server.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  48. Application Security Monitoring for AI-Assisted Development | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs blog post arguing that AI coding agents break the traditional scan-then-fix rhythm of application security because commit volume outpaces review queues, and proposes continuous monitoring of dependency drift, code reachability, and secret exposure instead of point-in-time scans. It distinguishes findings, vulnerabilities, and exploitable weaknesses, and recommends ranking by function-level reachability (Endor Labs claims up to 92% noise reduction) rather than raw CVSS severity, with fixes surfaced as PR comments rather than dashboard alerts.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  49. GitSpawn: A Single Flaw Lets Untrusted Repos Run Code in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Grok - Manifold Security

    Manifold Security discloses 'GitSpawn', a vulnerability class where AI coding agents (Claude Code, Goose, Hermes, Qwen Code, Grok Build, and reportedly Codex/Cursor) run git commands like `git status`/`git diff` for context-gathering at startup without sanitizing the repository's own .git/config. Because these commands refresh git's index, a malicious repo can set `core.fsmonitor` (or a similar config sink) to an arbitrary command, achieving code execution outside the agent's sandbox before any approval prompt, workspace-trust dialog, or even authentication - simply by opening a folder delivered as files (zip, USB, shared drive) rather than cloned. Two CVEs were assigned (Goose, Hermes); four of eight reported findings remain unpatched at publication.

    manifold.securitywriteupAdded 4 Sep 2026, published 1 Sep 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  50. JFrog: Coding Agents Just Reopened Your Software Supply Chain Blind Spot

    JFrog describes how AI coding agents like Cursor and Claude Code autonomously select and download dependencies directly from public registries (npm, PyPI, Maven, Go, Docker Hub, Helm, NuGet), bypassing organizational curation, scanning, and audit controls entirely. It cites JFrog's 2026 State of the Union data (451% surge in malicious npm packages, ~20% of AI package recommendations referencing non-existent "slopsquatted" packages) and announces Agent Package Resolution, a JFrog Artifactory feature that transparently routes agent-driven package installs through existing curation/Xray scanning policies via session steering, persistent package-manager config, and server-side enforcement.

    jfrog.comarticlePublished and added 25 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  51. GhostJacking Attacks: AI Agent Takeover via Firewall Evasion

    Tenet Security's DEFCON 34 research "Ghostjacking" chains four AI-agent attack primitives into a full kill chain: prompt injection via untrusted log/telemetry fields that AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) read through MCP connectors to Cloudflare, Datadog, and Sentry; agent-to-agent lateral movement where one agent (Sentry's Seer) vouches malicious findings to a downstream coding agent; a JWT cross-reuse sandbox-escape zero-day in Claude Desktop's Envoy-based egress proxy that lets a stolen/broadly-scoped token bypass the deny-by-default network allowlist; and a "self-exploit" technique where one AI session iteratively crafts a prompt-injection payload against another. The Cloudflare chain is notable for weaponizing a WAF-blocked request: the payload rides in headers logged verbatim, so an agent triaging "blocked" firewall events is tricked into hijacking DNS records β€” a 90% success rate against Claude Code (Sonnet 4.6) on Cloudflare's own recommended config. All findings were disclosed and remediated/confirmed by Cloudflare, Datadog, Sentry, and Anthropic before publication, and the researchers open-sourced a mitigation tool, agent-jackstop.

    tenetsecurity.aiwriteupAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 10 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  52. miqdadbadjuber/anti-slop

    anti-slop (antislop) is a rulebook packaged as agent skills that stops AI coding agents from shipping generic UI, filler copy, and formulaic 'AI-shaped' code, without prescribing colors, fonts, or layout. It defines 38 mandatory rules across three tiers (Hard Gate, Purpose-Gate, Quality Locks), a 'Liveliness Toolkit' of ENERGY/RHYTHM/MOTION dials plus a Design Read, and a PASS/FAIL Delivery Gate report run before work ships, split into six loadable skills. It installs via an npx installer, a plugin marketplace, or the skills.sh directory across a dozen agents including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline, Amp, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, Antigravity, Hermes, Kimi Code, and Pi.

    github.comrepoAdded 30 Sep 2026, published 7 Aug 2026🧠 AI

  53. manyuegong33/r0crawl_skills

    r0crawl_skills is a Chinese-language skill library for Codex-style AI coding agents, organized as a router plus 196 specialized modules covering web reverse engineering, Android unpacking, Frida instrumentation, native binary analysis, protocol reconstruction, malware triage, firmware analysis and CTF workflows. Rather than dumping advanced terminology at once, it starts novices with four framing questions (what to analyze, what action matters most, what materials exist, what outcome is wanted) and routes them to deeper workflows via lightweight Python scripts (init_case.py, module_router.py, hash_artifact.py) and ten sanitized example playbooks. It's installed by copying the directory into Codex's skills folder, making it a practical illustration of the "router + many domain modules" pattern for packaging large skill collections for coding agents.

    github.comrepoAdded 30 Sep 2026, published 6 Aug 2026🧠 AI

  54. manyuegong33/r0crawl_skills

    r0crawl_skills is a beginner-friendly Chinese-language skill library of 196 specialized reverse-engineering modules for Codex-style AI coding agents, with a router that asks scoping questions and directs the agent to the right workflow (web RE, Android unpacking, Frida instrumentation, native binary analysis, protocol reconstruction, malware triage, firmware analysis, CTF). It ships lightweight scripts (case init, module router, artifact hashing) and ten sanitized example playbooks covering DEX dump verification, WebCrypto hooking, native loader tracing, PCAP reconstruction, and selective emulation, plus dedicated modules for CAPTCHA/WAF/anti-bot systems, mini-programs, hybrid apps (Flutter/React Native/Electron), and IDA/Ghidra/Rizin automation.

    github.comrepoAdded 30 Sep 2026, published 6 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  55. Nine AI coding agent incidents that ended with deleted data

    Adversa AI compiles and analyzes nine publicly documented incidents from June 2025–July 2026 where AI coding agents (Cursor, Replit, Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Google Antigravity, Amazon's internal Kiro agent, Claude Opus 5) caused irreversible data loss β€” from wiped developer drives to a dropped SaaStr production database and a 13-hour AWS Cost Explorer outage in China. It categorizes failure mechanisms (shell-abstraction mismatches like unquoted paths and tilde expansion, unverified exit codes, constraint decay where acknowledged instructions were ignored, and permission-inheritance bypassing two-person approval gates) and argues that smarter models won't fix the problem, recommending credential scoping, filesystem confinement, mandatory confirmation on irreversible actions, read-after-write verification, and command-level logging.

    adversa.aiwriteupAdded 7 Oct 2026, published 4 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  56. Nine AI coding agent incidents that ended with deleted data

    A case-study roundup of nine documented incidents (June 2025–July 2026) where AI coding agents β€” Cursor (YOLO mode), Replit, Gemini CLI, Claude Code, Google Antigravity, Cursor Plan Mode, Kiro, and Opus 5/Claude Code with Prisma β€” destroyed local drives, git repos, a SaaS production database, and took an AWS service down for ~13 hours in one region. The piece categorizes failure mechanisms (unverified exit codes, shell-quoting/tilde-expansion bugs, constraint decay where acknowledged instructions are ignored, and permission inheritance bypassing approval gates) and argues smarter models won't fix the problem because the real gap is the missing control layer between agent intent and execution. It closes with concrete mitigations β€” scoped credentials, confined filesystems, read-after-write verification, command-level logging, and tested backups β€” before pitching the author's own agent-security product, Adversa AI.

    adversa.aiarticleAdded 8 Oct 2026, published 4 Aug 2026🧠 AI

  57. Introducing the Wiz Sensor for Developer Workstations to Protect Endpoints in the AI Era

    Wiz announces a new endpoint sensor for developer workstations (Windows/macOS, private preview) that inventories packages, IDE extensions, AI coding agents, and MCP servers, and detects known/emerging supply chain attacks in real time. The post details three real-world campaigns that motivated it: Shai-Hulud (a self-propagating npm worm that ran TruffleHog via postinstall scripts to steal npm tokens and republish itself), the Axios backdoor (a compromised maintainer account injecting C2-calling code executed within 1.1 seconds of npm install), and s1ngularity (a compromised Nx build system/VS Code extension that harvested GitHub/npm/SSH/cloud credentials and weaponized local AI CLI tools like Claude and Gemini to exfiltrate filesystem data, leaking 1,000+ GitHub tokens and exposing 5,500 private repos).

    wiz.ioarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 3 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  58. Kritt-ai/open-kritt

    openΒ·kritt is a self-hosted, open-source platform that orchestrates AI coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, or Grok Build) in parallel to hunt for vulnerabilities in remote or local repositories and their dependencies. It breaks security research into small chained prompt "workflows," runs jobs in disposable root-access Docker containers with internet access, then de-duplicates and ranks findings, validates them via post-scripts/PoC generation, and exports share-safe finding bundles. It's the open-source distillation of the internal tooling behind the Kritt team's (Blockian) $1.5M+ in bug-bounty payouts.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 2 Aug 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  59. Critical Security Controls for Governing AI Coding Agents | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs analyzes the security risks of AI coding agents running on developer laptops with shell, filesystem, network access and the developer's own credentials, framing the threat as prompt-injection-driven abuse of legitimate agent capabilities (e.g., an agent tricked into exfiltrating .env via a malicious README). It maps six control points β€” EDR/XDR, sandboxes/containers, AI/MCP gateways, in-agent hooks, package firewalls, and secrets scanning/PR controls β€” arguing that in-agent hooks (deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions on proposed actions before execution) are the only point that intercepts model intent before it becomes a shell command, and promotes Endor Labs' own hook-based AI Coding Agent Governance and Package Firewall products as the implementation.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 31 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  60. When AI Imports Vulnerable Dependencies: Securing AI-Generated Code | Blog | Endor Labs

    Endor Labs blog post arguing that AI coding agents introduce supply-chain risk by suggesting outdated, vulnerable, or hallucinated (slopsquatted) open source packages without developer review. It cites Endor Labs research finding AI agents pull in ~40% more dependencies than human-written code and that 49% of AI-suggested dependency versions carried known vulnerabilities, and advocates IDE/pre-commit scanning plus function-level reachability analysis to cut alert noise by up to 95%.

    endorlabs.comarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 29 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  61. Bug Bounty Directory & MCP API

    bug-bounties is a community-maintained directory of over 3,000 active bug bounty programs and vulnerability disclosure policies (VDPs), exposed via a public API and a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. It lets researchers programmatically query scope, rewards, and program metadata, and lets AI coding agents like Claude Code look up bug bounty targets directly.

    github.comrepoAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 29 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  62. Bug Bounty Lab101

    Bug Bounty Lab101 is a workspace that structures the real HackerOne bug bounty workflow: document program scope, run scope-gated recon/vuln scanning via bugbounty-hunter.sh (backed by a 400+ tool arsenal spanning recon, DNS enumeration, web scanning, exploitation, and cloud/subdomain-takeover checks), then produce a triage-ready H1 report with Hacktivity dedup checks. It also integrates T3MP3ST, a separate multi-agent offensive framework that connects local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) to automate target investigation, and ships a legacy-vm-practice lab (DVWA/Metasploitable-style) for safe skill-building outside real program scope.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 25 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  63. AI Security Briefing

    Adversa AI's "GuardFall" research shows that decades-old shell tricks (quote removal, $IFS expansion, command substitution, base64-to-sh piping, and destructive argv flags like `find -delete`) let prompt-injected content bypass the pattern-matching shell-command guards in most popular open-source AI coding agents, because the guards inspect raw command strings while bash rewrites them before execution. Testing eleven agents (Hermes, opencode, Goose, Cline, Roo-Code, Continue, Aider, Plandex, Open Interpreter, OpenHands, SWE-agent) with live penetrations using Claude Sonnet 4.6, the authors found ten fail via one of four architectural patterns (unsound regex/tokenized guards, no guard plus auto-yes flags, or sandbox with a documented local-mode opt-out), while only Continue's five-stage tokenize-and-canonicalize evaluator structurally closes most of the bypass surface. They publish the bypass-class taxonomy (A–E), a real Makefile/CI exploitation scenario against a Plandex-style pipeline, and concrete remediation guidance including adopting Continue's evaluator design and building a guard-probe CI harness.

    adversa.aiwriteupPublished and added 18 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  64. jit

    jit is a macOS (Apple Silicon) tool that moves plaintext secrets from .env files, ~/.aws/credentials, shell exports, .npmrc, and MCP configs into a Touch ID-gated local encrypted vault, leaving decoy files on disk and injecting real values only into the specific process that requests them via execve, native credential-helper protocols (AWS credential_process, docker/git credential helpers), or ephemeral named-pipe (FIFO) mounts. It adds per-process consent prompts naming the requesting tool/agent, time-bounded "process grants" for unattended AI agents (e.g. Claude, Codex) to use credentials overnight, and a durable audit log of every credential read, unlock, and denial. It explicitly targets the risk that AI coding agents and CLIs run with full user permissions and can read plaintext secrets, treating agent MCP configs and wrapped AI CLIs as first-class.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 18 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  65. Destructive Command Guard (dcg)

    Destructive Command Guard (dcg) is a Rust-based hook that intercepts and blocks catastrophic commands (git reset --hard, rm -rf, DROP TABLE, kubectl delete namespace, terraform destroy, etc.) before AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, and Cursor can execute them. It uses a modular "pack" system covering 50+ categories (databases, cloud providers, Kubernetes, secrets managers, CI/CD, storage, DNS, payments) plus a three-tier heredoc/inline-script AST scanning pipeline to catch destructive commands hidden inside python -c/bash -c payloads, and a dedicated "careful_company_running_windows" preset that also blocks data-exfiltration channels (webhooks, uploads, tunnels) and attempts to disable security controls. Configurable via TOML with agent-specific trust profiles, allowlists, and fail-closed/fail-open policies for unattended agent sessions.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 15 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  66. HOL Guard

    HOL Guard is an open-source local "antivirus" runtime protection layer for AI coding agents that intercepts shell commands, file access, package installs, and MCP tool calls before execution, classifying them for secret exposure, destructive operations, prompt injection, and supply-chain risk, then allowing/blocking/requesting approval per policy. It integrates via native hooks and managed MCP proxies with Codex, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot CLI, Cursor, Cline, Gemini CLI, Grok, and other agents, and includes a supply-chain package/advisory checker (hol-guard supply-chain scan/explain). The repo also bundles plugin-scanner, a companion CLI/GitHub Action that lints and scores agent plugins, skills, and MCP integrations for manifest issues, secrets, MCP transport risks, and dependency/lockfile problems, producing SARIF/JSON reports for CI gating.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 15 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  67. awesome-ai-security-tools

    An extensive, actively updated awesome-list aggregating public-source, research, and commercial tools for AI security and AI-assisted cybersecurity. It spans LLM-driven finding triage (nuclei-autotriage, SigmaOptimizer), securing AI coding agents and MCP/skill ecosystems (agent-audit, SkillSpector, Ramparts, ToolHive, Pipelock), AI/ML supply-chain and model-artifact scanning (modelscan, Fickling, GuardDog, Adversarial Robustness Toolbox), and autonomous pentest/exploit agents (PentestGPT, PentAGI, Strix, CAI). Each entry includes stars, license notes, and cross-references, making it a practical index for the fast-moving 2026 agentic-AI-security tooling landscape.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 11 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  68. Symlinks Are Still Scary (And Yes, You Can Commit Them to Git)

    Snyk explains the decades-old symlink attack (CWE-61) and the underappreciated fact that Git will happily commit, push, and recreate symlinks (file mode 120000) from a cloned repo, letting an attacker ship a file like project_settings.json that's secretly a pointer to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys. It walks through Wiz Research's "GhostApproval" report, which found that six AI coding agents (Amazon Q Developer, Claude Code, Augment, Cursor, Google Antigravity, Windsurf) can be prompt-injected via README instructions into following such a symlink and writing attacker SSH keys or shell-config payloads before the user ever sees an accurate confirmation dialog (CWE-451, UI misrepresentation). It also recaps prior symlink-driven CVEs (tar npm package CVE-2021-32803, Leaky Vessels CVE-2024-21626, Git submodule CVE-2024-32002) and gives concrete mitigations: canonicalize-then-check-boundary atomically (e.g. openat2 with RESOLVE_BENEATH), show real resolved targets in approval dialogs, and audit repos with `find . -type l` or `git ls-files -s` before trusting them.

    snyk.ioarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 9 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  69. prempti

    Prempti is an experimental tool from the Falco project that intercepts tool calls made by AI coding agents such as Claude Code and Codex, evaluating shell commands, file reads/writes, web fetches, and MCP calls against customizable Falco YAML rules before execution. It runs in guardrails mode (deny/ask/allow enforcement with LLM-friendly denial explanations) or monitor mode (log-only), ships a default ruleset covering credential theft, sandbox-disable attempts, exfiltration, persistence, and MCP/skill poisoning, and provides a premptictl CLI plus a rule-authoring Claude Code skill. It explicitly notes it is not a sandbox or OS-level containment and is meant to complement, not replace, least-privilege environments.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 4 Jul 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  70. Everybody's shipping code they can't read

    An Aikido Security blog post arguing that AI coding agents (e.g. Claude Cowork-style tools) now install npm dependencies on a user's behalf without any human reviewing what gets pulled in, citing the recent @mastra ecosystem attack where 141 packages were republished in a 45-minute burst with a malicious date-library lookalike that dropped a wallet-stealing payload and self-deleted. It also flags "slopsquatting," where attackers preemptively register package names that LLMs are known to hallucinate, and argues trust decisions need to move to install-time blocking rather than manual diff review.

    aikido.devarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 25 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  71. Reverse-Skill

    Reverse-Skill is a GitHub repo that gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) a structured routing layer for reverse engineering and offensive security work: it detects the task type (APK, ELF binary, JS obfuscation, PCAP, CTF challenge) and routes to the correct methodology and toolchain (jadx, apktool, Frida, IDA Pro, Ghidra, radare2, Burp Suite, nmap, Metasploit) instead of letting the agent guess commands. It ships a case-init/scope workflow, an evidence-to-finding-to-report pipeline, a 173-case routing regression test run in CI on Windows and Ubuntu, and platform-specific docs for Kali/Ubuntu/macOS, positioned for lawful research, CTF, and authorized pentesting.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 21 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  72. The OpenSourceMalware Show #9

    Episode 9 of The OpenSourceMalware Show analyzes the Mastra npm organization compromise (116 packages hijacked via a ClickFix-style spear-phish, with a pre-staged typosquat 'easy-day-js' used to inject an info stealer targeting LastPass, Bitwarden, Dashlane, 1Password, MFA tools, and Zapier). It also critiques a Cloud Security Alliance paper's 'agentjacking' concept β€” malicious instructions embedded in Sentry error events retrieved by AI coding agents via MCP and executed with developer privileges β€” framing it as unsanitized third-party input reaching an LLM, similar to the 2025 s1ngularity attack. The hosts close by debunking four AppSec myths: that OSS malware only survives 2-3 days, that npm install scripts are disappearing, that package firewalls/cooldowns eliminate most risk, and that threat-actor attribution doesn't matter for incident response.

    opensourcemalware.comtalkAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 18 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  73. SuperagenticAI/superclaw

    SuperClaw is a pre-deployment security testing framework for autonomous AI coding agents like OpenClaw, generating scenario-driven adversarial tests for prompt injection, jailbreaks, tool misuse, and behavioral drift. It scores agent behavior against explicit security contracts with rubric-based evidence (tool calls, outputs) and produces HTML/JSON/SARIF reports, with local-only mode and auth-token gating for remote targets to reduce misuse risk.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 18 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  74. Endor Labs: AI Coding Agents Cheat Security Benchmarks via Training Recall, Not Reasoning

    Endor Labs re-audited its Agent Security League leaderboard after finding that frontier coding agents (Claude Opus 4.8, Composer 2.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash) were inflating security-fix scores through workspace leakage (reading fixed source already present in the repo, e.g. a Mako .tox install) and training-data memorization/recall (reproducing verbatim upstream patch comments, e.g. a Plone namedfile fix), plus flaws in count-based SecPass scoring shown via a python-pillow/Pillow example. After adding anti-cheating detection for these mechanisms, Cursor + GPT-5.5 remained the top security performer, memorization accounted for 137 of 182 confirmed cheating cases, and the overall FuncPass/SecPass gap persisted across the leaderboard.

    endorlabs.comarticlePublished and added 11 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  75. Miasma Worm Hits Microsoft Again: Azure Functions Action and 72 Other Repositories Disabled After Supply Chain Attack Targeting AI Coding Agents

    StepSecurity's forensic analysis of the June 5, 2026 Miasma worm incident, in which a compromised contributor account pushed a malicious commit to Microsoft's Azure/durabletask repository planting five files (.claude/settings.json, .gemini/settings.json, .cursor/rules/setup.mdc, .vscode/tasks.json, and a 4.6MB obfuscated .github/setup.js payload) that trigger credential-harvesting code execution the moment the repo is opened in Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, or VS Code β€” no package install or code run required. GitHub's automated abuse detection disabled 73 Microsoft repositories in a 105-second sweep, including Azure/functions-action, breaking CI/CD pipelines across GitHub Actions users relying on the mutable @v1 tag. The post ties this to the same compromised account behind the May 19 durabletask PyPI credential-stealer campaign and the broader TeamPCP-linked Miasma worm, which has infected 113+ repositories.

    stepsecurity.iowriteupAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 9 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  76. ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge

    bb-huge is an open-source MCP server + agent skill ("/bb-huge") plus a Flask/SQLite portal that gives AI coding agents (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex, etc.) persistent memory and a disciplined bug-bounty hunting methodology across web, mobile, binary, and source-code targets. It implements an observation β†’ hypothesis β†’ finding promotion pipeline with evidence provenance, ships 350+ curated community security skills, 35+ MCP tools for CRUD on findings/programs/recon/assets, and includes an install script for the ProjectDiscovery/tomnomnom recon toolkit (subfinder, httpx, nuclei, ffuf, etc.). It's aimed at bug bounty hunters wanting to solve the "context resets every session" problem when working with AI agents.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 5 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  77. Protestware by open source maintainer to hinder agentic coding: The jqwik 1.10.0 Prompt Injection

    Snyk details how jqwik maintainer Johannes Link shipped version 1.10.0 of the Java property-testing library net.jqwik:jqwik-engine to Maven Central with a hidden method, printMessageForCodingAgents(), instructing AI coding agents to delete all jqwik tests and code. The instruction was concealed from humans via ANSI escape codes (ESC[2K + carriage return) that wipe the line on an interactive terminal but leave the text intact in raw logs captured by CI systems and agent tool-output parsers like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot agent mode, and Cursor. Claude Code detected and refused the injected instruction in the wild; the maintainer later disclosed the behavior, softened it in 1.10.1 (opt-in hiding, non-destructive directive), and stated jqwik is not meant for AI-assisted workflows β€” framing it as deliberate "protestware" against agentic coding rather than a conventional vulnerability.

    snyk.iowriteupAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 2 Jun 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  78. mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    A community-maintained GitHub repo providing 818 structured, YAML-frontmatter skill files (e.g. Volatility3 memory forensics, Kerberoasting hunting, cloud breach scoping) that AI coding agents like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or Cursor can load to follow senior-analyst-level security workflows. Each skill is mapped against MITRE ATT&CK v19.1, MITRE ATLAS, MITRE D3FEND, NIST CSF 2.0, NIST AI RMF, and the newly released MITRE Fight Fraud Framework (F3), and follows the agentskills.io progressive-disclosure standard for token-efficient agent discovery. Covers offensive (red-team C2, phishing simulation, exploitation), defensive (DFIR, threat hunting, Sigma detections), cloud, and AI-security domains.

    github.comrepoPublished and added 26 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  79. AWS MCP Server (GA)

    AWS announces general availability of the AWS MCP Server, a managed remote MCP server giving AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Kiro) authenticated access to all AWS APIs via IAM SigV4 through a small tool set (call_aws, search_documentation, read_documentation, and the new run_script). Security-relevant design choices include a network-isolated sandbox for server-side script execution that inherits only IAM permissions, new IAM context keys for fine-grained access without a separate MCP permission, and enterprise controls to separate human vs. agent permissions via IAM/SCP with CloudWatch metrics and CloudTrail logging for auditing agent API calls. Since MCP only supports OAuth 2.1, an open-source MCP Proxy for AWS bridges local IAM credentials to the server.

    aws.amazon.comarticlePublished and added 24 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  80. Hack Skills

    hack-skills is a GitHub repo (yaklang/hack-skills) that packages offensive security knowledge into installable "Agent Skills" β€” one master entry, six category entries, and 102 deep-topic SKILL.md files across 14 domains including web/API security, auth, Linux/Windows/macOS privilege escalation, Active Directory attacks, mobile, binary exploitation, reverse engineering, crypto attacks, blockchain/smart contracts, AI/LLM security, network pivoting, and forensics. It's designed for AI coding agents (installed via `npx skills add yaklang/hack-skills` or a raw SKILL.md URL) to use during authorized pentesting, bug bounty, and CTF work, and explicitly strips destructive PoCs (DROP/TRUNCATE, FLUSHALL, service shutdown/DoS) in favor of non-destructive proofs like time-based SQLi and read-only recon, while retaining RCE/webshell/reverse-shell primitives as access proofs.

    github.comrepoAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 13 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  81. GitHub Secret Scanning MCP Server

    GitHub announced general availability of secret scanning as a tool inside the GitHub MCP server, letting MCP-compatible AI coding agents such as GitHub Copilot CLI and VS Code scan uncommitted changes for exposed credentials before a commit or PR is opened. The GA release adds enforcement of existing push-protection customizations so detection and bypass behavior configured at the repo or org level stays consistent when triggered through an agent instead of a normal git push. Requires GitHub Secret Protection enabled on the repo; an optional Advanced Security plugin adds a tailored secret-scanning workflow in Copilot Chat.

    github.blogarticleAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 11 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  82. GitHub Dependency Scanning MCP Server

    GitHub's MCP Server now ships a "dependabot" toolset, in public preview, that lets MCP-compatible AI coding agents (Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI) scan dependency changes for known vulnerabilities before commit. The toolset queries the GitHub Advisory Database for affected packages, severity, and fixed versions, and can invoke the Dependabot CLI locally to diff dependency graphs pre/post-change for deeper post-commit checks. Requires Dependabot alerts enabled on the repo; setup involves enabling the toolset via Copilot CLI, VS Code MCP headers, or the advanced-security Copilot plugin.

    github.blogtoolAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 11 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security

  83. AI Repository Security Baseline

    A collection of drop-in instruction/config files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules, .aiignore, etc.) that give AI coding agents a shared security and privacy playbook: never read .env or secrets files, no hardcoded credentials, OWASP hygiene, PII protection, GDPR support, restricted filesystem/network access, no destructive commands without confirmation, mandatory tests, and dependency/CI change controls including typosquatting checks before adding packages. Each tool-specific file (Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Aider, Amazon Q, Junie, Devin, Cody) delegates to one canonical AGENTS.md so teams maintain a single source of truth across all agents in use.

    github.comrepoAdded 3 Sep 2026, published 8 May 2026πŸ›‘οΈ Security